Small Fruit Crop Germplasm Committee Vulnerability Statement - (April 2000)
The Small Fruit Crop Germplasm Committee Vulnerability Statement was assembled
in four parts based on the major small fruit genera as follows:
I. Fragaria
Coordinators: James Hancock, Michigan State University; James Luby, University
of Minnesota
II. Ribes
Coordinator: Kim Hummer, USDA-ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Corvallis,
Ore.
III. Rubus
Coordinators: Chad Finn, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, Ore.; Carlos Fear, Sweetbriar
Development Inc., Watsonville, Cal.
IV. Vaccinium
Coordinators: Paul Lyrene, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Mark Ehlenfeldt,
USDA-ARS, Chatsworth, N.J.
The CGC Chair was assigned overall responsibility for the assembly of the
document and it is to the Chair that any questions or concerns should be directed.
The coordinators responsibility was to draw on the experts within each genera
to assemble their respective vulnerability statements. The formats for each
genera varied considerably; the Ribes statement is all-inclusive and
complete, whereas the Rubus and Fragaria statements are more concise
statements that will hopefully be easily used by others dealing with germplasm
issues in these genera. Hopefully, the next revision of this document will begin
to apply some standardization. The coordinators began their work in the summer
of 1999. The document in total was put to the Crop Germplasm Committee for approval
by email and subsequently approved in Spring 2000. The document has subsequently
been submitted to the USDA-ARS Plant Germplasm Office.
I. Fragaria
A. Needs for collection and preservation
A high priority should be given to rounding out the world collection of octoploid
strawberries, since they represent an extensive array of diversity that can
be directly incorporated into commercial cultivars. Fragaria chiloensis
has been adequately collected from most of its native range, although more attention
needs to be placed on its northern reaches in Alaska. In addition, a number
of valuable land races of F. chiloensis still need to be collected in
Chile, Peru and Colombia. Collections of F. virginiana are much more
spotty than F. chiloensis, with the most important holes being in northwestern
and northeastern Canada, the midwestern United States, and the southwestern
United States below Colorado. Fragaria iturupensis also warrants much
additional attention, as it has only been described at one location in Asia
and has not been collected at all.
The collection of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid Fragaria is of secondary
importance to the octoploids. However, we need to get a better representation
of the Asian diploids and tetraploids, as only a few clones of each is currently
represented in the national germplasm collection, and these species will ultimately
be the key to determining evolutionary relationships in the genus.
B. Needs for evaluation and enhancement A USDA funded effort is ongoing to
determine how representative the national germplasm collection reflects the
native diversity patterns of the octoploids, but there remains a critical need
to screen the existing collections of octoploid clones for disease resistance.
The diseases which deserve the most attention are anthracnose, angular leaf
spot, verticillium wilt and botrytis (both crown and foliar), as they are particularly
widespread problems. Emphasis also needs to be placed on finding new sources
of day?neutrality and heat tolerance in F. virginiana, as our current
day?neutral cultivars perform poorly when mid?summer temperatures exceed 28
C.
II. Ribes
A. Introduction
The genus Ribes L., the currants and gooseberries, includes more than
150 described species of shrubs which are native throughout Northern Europe,
Asia, North America, and in mountainous areas of South America and northwest
Africa (Brennan, 1996). Only about twelve of these species comprise the primary
gene pool from which domesticated currants and gooseberries were developed.
Total world Ribes acreage was stable over the past several decades although
the breakup of the former Soviet Union greatly increased fruit availability.
Black currants, the major crop, are primarily grown for the juice market. They
are also valued for production of jams, jellies, liqueurs, such as 'Creme de
cassis' in France, for the conversion of white wines to rosé, and as flavorants
and colorants for dairy products. Black currant juice has intense flavor, color,
high ascorbic acid, and other antioxidant levels that are now becoming recognized
for nutraceutical properties. Poland, the Russian Federation, United Kingdom,
and the Scandinavian countries lead the world production of black currants.
Red currants are valued for fresh market and for the production of preserves
and juice. The main red currant producers are Poland, Germany, Holland, Belgium,
France, and Hungary. Gooseberries, which are eaten fresh or processed into pies
and jams, are primarily grown in Poland, Germany, and Hungary (Brennan, 1996).
Several species of currants have ornamental qualities for plant habit, flowering,
or fall foliage.
Ribes production is negligible in North America because of white pine
blister rust, Cronartium ribicola J. C. Fischer, a disease introduced from Asia,
which kills susceptible five-needled white pines but does no great damage to
Ribes. Ribes and Pinus L. subgenus Strobus are alternate
hosts for this disease. Since the early 1900's, Ribes culture has been
restricted in parts of the United States in an attempt to curtail white pine
blister rust.
B. Ribes distribution and important species
Taxonomy
Ribes was originally placed in the Saxifragaceae (Engler and Prantl,
1891; Vetenant,1799), but more recent taxonomic treatments classify the genus
in the family Grossulariaceae because of wholly inferior ovary, totally syncarpous
gynoecium, and fleshy fruit (Cronquist, 1981; Lamarck and De Candolle, 1805;
Sinnott, 1985).
Early classifications also recognized two genera, Ribes, and Grossularia
(Berger, 1924; Coville and Britton, 1908; Komarov, 1971). Numerous infrageneric
classifications are proposed for these two genera. Prevalent monographs recognize
a single genus, Ribes (de Janczewski, 1907; Sinnott, 1985). Crossability
between gooseberry and currant species supports the concept of a single genus
(Keep, 1962). De Janczewski (1907) subdivided the genus into six subgenera:
Coreosma, the black currants; Ribes (=Ribesia), the red currants;
Grossularia, the gooseberries; Grossularioides, the spiny currants;
Parilla, the Andean currants; Berisia, the European alpine currants
The centers of diversity for Coreosma, Ribes, and Berisia
include Northern Europe, Scandinavia and the Russian Federation (Jennings et
al., 1987); and for Grossularia in the Pacific Northwest of North America
(Rehder, 1986). In addition several species of black currants with sessile yellow
glands are native to South America.
Cytology and Evolution
The basic chromosome number of Ribes is x = 8 (Zielinski, 1953) and
all species and cultivars are diploid. The chromosome complement and karyotype
are highly uniform (Sinnott, 1985) and the chromosomes are 1.5 to 2.5 µm (Darlington,
1929). Mitotic and meiotic processes are also highly uniform (Zielinski, 1953).
The principal evolutionary pressure in the genus appears to be geographical
adaptation (Sinnott, 1985). Messinger et al. (1999) examined subgeneric taxa
of Ribes for restriction site variation in two cpDNA regions. While several
infrageneric lineages were strongly supported, Grossularioides species
were unexpectedly united with those from Grossularia. Coreosma
species exhibited high divergence and were not monophyletic in the analysis.
Messinger et al. (1999) consider two possible, not mutually exclusive, evolutionary
scenarios for Ribes: 1) long periods of stasis is interrupted by sudden
radiation of species; 2) gene flow due to hybridization as a force for diversification.
Endangered Species
The genus Ribes is fairly robust. Most species are broadly distributed
and are not in danger of extinction. However, the World Conservation Monitoring
Center 1997 Red List of Threatened plants (www.wcmc.org) includes 18 Ribes
species. Ribes kolymense (Trautv.) Komarov ex Pojark is extinct from
the former Soviet states; three American and one Sardinian species are endangered;
six American are vulnerable; two from the Pacific Northwest, another Sardinian
and a Chilean species are rare; three Russian species are indeterminate. Ribes
ussuriense, one of the Russian species listed as indeterminate, contains
the dominant gene, Cr, for immunity from white pine blister rust (Brennan,
1996). Genes from this species have allowed the cultivation of black currants
in some of the white pine blister rust restricted zones of the United States.
The Endangered Species Act of the United States (Department of the Interior,
Fish and Wildlife Service, 50 CFR Part 17) lists the Miccosukee gooseberry,
R. echinellum (Cov.) Rehder. This spiny-fruited gooseberry species whose
native habitat occurs along the shoreline of Lake Miccosukee near Monticello,
Florida, and in limited locations in South Carolina and Georgia, is threatened
by encroaching human development. Several accessions of this species are maintained
ex situ at the National Clonal Germplasm Repository at Corvallis, Oregon.
The Oregon National Heritage Program lists R. cereum var. colubrinum
Hitchc. as rare, and R. divaricatum and R. klamathense (Cov.)
Fedde as indeterminate.
C. Present germplasm activities
The U. S. national collection of currants and gooseberries, Ribes L.,
resides at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service,
National Clonal Germplasm Repository, in Corvallis, Oregon. As of January 2000,
this collection consists of 87 species and 803 available accessions (Table 1).
Background and evaluation data are loaded to the Germplasm Resource Information
Network, which can be obtained through a database search on the web at: www.ars-grin.gov/npgs.
Images of flowers and fruit will be loaded to the GRIN system during 2000.
The species collection consists of seeds stored at -20 o C, with single clone
representatives of specific seed lots maintained as plants in the field. Cultivars
undergo pathogen-testing procedures. Pathogen-negative plants are maintained
under screen to prevent re-infection by viruses. A core collection of 335 accessions
has been designated to represent species diversity. For on-site back up, 66
accessions are preserved as in vitro cultures in short-term storage at 4 o C,
and about half of these are backed-up at the National Seed Storage Laboratory,
Ft. Collins, Colorado. Virus testing, in vitro culture, and cryogenic preservation
will be performed on additional accessions as resources permit.
D. Status of crop vulnerability
Several diseases and pests challenge the culture of Ribes for fruit
production. Key pests in Europe include black currant reversion virus and the
black currant gall mite, Cecidophyopsis ribis Westw. Key pests in North
America include white pine blister rust, Cronartium ribicola J. C. Fischer,
and powdery mildew Sphaerotheca mors-uvae Schw. Additional pests include
caneborers, aphids, sawflies, and others (Table 2). Breeders are looking to
expand the range of production by producing plants that resist spring frosts,
survive drought and heat, and are disease and insect resistant or immune.
In North America, 15 states have regulations prohibiting or restricting Ribes
culture because of white pine blister rust. Ribes cultivation must work
in consort with foresters to minimize the risk of increasing the incidence of
white pine blister rust in North America.
E. Germplasm needs
Collections The U.S. Ribes collection lacks representation more than
67 species from around the world. Significant disease resistant European and
Asian species are not in the collection (Table 3.) Ribes ussuriensis,
the species with potentially the most economically important genes for North
America, is not represented in the Repository collection. The collection is
also missing major European cultivars of black, red and white currants, and
large fruited gooseberries. Many heirloom cultivars are in the British, German,
French, Scandinavian, Polish, Dutch, Belgian, and other Eastern European collections.
A significant effort should be made to import these older cultivars into the
United States and establish them in the National Ribes collection at
Corvallis, Oregon. Any foreign Ribes plant must enter the United States
through the National Quarantine Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. Import permits
must be secured prior to requesting plant germplasm. Importation quotas have
been instituted at Quarantine center so prior approval must be obtained. Ribes
seed has no quarantine requirement.
Evaluation
The U. S. Ribes collection needs to be evaluated for resistance to the
diseases and pests mentioned in Table 2. These evaluations should be made at
locations where significant disease or pest pressure occurs. In terms of North
American priorities: evaluation of white pine blister rust resistance should
be first priority; mildew resistance second priority for diseases. For insect
difficulties caneborer, sawfly, and aphid resistance evaluation should be made.
A constant vigil should be made to avoid importation of black currant reversion
virus or of black currant gall mite or gooseberry mites.
Enhancement
Several institutions throughout the United States and North America are enhancing
breeding, or evaluating Ribes germplasm to a limited extent. These include:
Cornell University, University of Maryland, University of Minnesota, University
of Idaho, University of Guelph, and the USDA, ARS at Corvallis, Oregon. Ribes
is a significant horticultural crop in Eastern Europe. Programs for breeding
and enhancement exist in most of the Eastern European countries. Scotland, Poland,
Germany, Belgium and New Zealand specialize in black currant breeding. France,
Norway, Finland, Sweden, The Netherlands, and others breed for improvement of
currants and gooseberries.
Preservation
Additional technical staff members are needed at the Repository for small fruit
preservation. The number of accessions at the repository has doubled during
the past 10 years. The number will double again over the next ten years. The
Repository is in severe immediate need of an additional permanent technical
assistant for the maintenance of small fruit germplasm as in vitro cultures
and in cryogenics. In addition, a permanent technical assistant for small fruit
virus-testing and screenhouse plant maintenance is needed. An additional $100,000
increase in base funds plus administrative approval to recruit two permanent
federal technical support personnel for specifically for small fruit germplasm
maintenance is requested.
Recommendations
Literature cited
Berger, A. 1924. A taxonomic review of currants and gooseberries. Bull. New
York State Agric. Exp. Sta. 109.
Brennan, R. M. 1996. Currants and Gooseberries. Chapter 3 pp. 191-295 in: J.
Janick and J. N. Moore (eds.) Fruit Breeding, Vol. II Vine and Small Fruit Crops.
John Wiley & Sons. Inc. N.Y.
Coville, F. V. and Britton, N. L. 1908. Grossulariaceae. N. Am. Fl. 22:193-225.
Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants.
Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Darlington, C. D. 1929. A comparative study of the chromosome complement in
Ribes. Genetica 11:267-269.
Engler, A. and Prantl, K. 1891. Ribesioideae. Naturl. Pflanzenfam. 3:97-142.
Hamat, L., A. Porpaczy, D. G. Himelrick, and G. J. Galletta. 1989. Currant and
Gooseberry Management. Chapt. 6, pp. 245-272. In: G. J. Galletta and D. G. Himelrick,
(eds.) Small Fruit Crop Management. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Janczewski, E. de. 1907. Monograph of the currants Ribes L. (in French). Mem.
Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Geneve. 35: 199-517.
Jennings, D. L., Anderson, M. M., Brennan, R. M. 1987. Raspberry and blackcurrant
breeding. p. 135-147. In: A. J. Abbot and R. K. Atkin (eds.). Improving vegetatively
propagated crops. Academic Press, London.
Keep, E. 1962. Interspecific hybridization in Ribes. Genetica 33:1-23.
Komarov, V. L. (ed.). 1971. Flora of the [former] USSR Vol. IX p. 175-208. In:
Ribesioideae Engl. (Translated from the Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific
Translation, Jerusalem). Keter, London.
Lamarck, J. B., and De Candolle, A. P. 1805. Flore Francaise. Desray, Paris.
Messinger, W., A. Liston, and K. Hummer. 1998. Ribes phylogeny as indicated
by restriction-site polymorphisms of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics
and Evolution. In Press.
Rehder, A. 1954. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. 2nd ed. Macmillan: New
York.
Sinnott, Q. P. 1985. A revision of Ribes L. subg. Grossularia (Mill.)
per. Sect. Grossularia (Mill.) Nutt. (Grossulariaceae) in North America. Rhodora
87:189-286.
Tuinyla, V. and A. Lukosevicius. 1996. Pomology of Lithuania. Lithuanian Science
and Encyclopedia Publisher; Vilnius Lietuva, Lithuania.
Vetenant,1799. Tableau du regne vegetal. J. Drisonnier, Paris.
Zielinski, Q. B. 1953. Chromosome numbers and meiotic studies in Ribes. Bot.
Gaz. 114:265-274.
Table 1. Ribes L. in the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Corvallis, Oregon, as
of January 2000.
| Species |
No. of Accessions
|
| R. acicularis Smith |
1
|
| R. alpestre Decaisne |
1
|
| R. alpinum L. |
5
|
| R. altissimum Turcz. Ex Pojark |
2
|
| R. amarum |
1
|
| R. americanum Mill. |
5
|
| R. aureum Pursh |
14
|
| R. binominatum A. A. Heller |
3
|
| R. bracteosum Doug. Ex Hook. |
19
|
| R. burejense F. Schmidt |
2
|
| R. californicum hesperium (McClat.) |
1
|
| R. cereum Douglas |
21
|
| R. cereum colubrinum C. Hitchc. |
1
|
| R. cereum inebrians (Lindley C. |
1
|
| R. ciliatum Humb. & Bonpl. |
1
|
| R. coloradense Cov. |
4
|
| R. cruentum Greene |
9
|
| R. curvatum Small |
3
|
| R. cynosbati L. |
3
|
| R. diacanatha Pall. |
9
|
| R. dikuscha Fisch. Ex Turkz. |
1
|
| R. divaricatum Dougl.(z) |
1
|
| R. echinellum (Cov.) Rehderz |
2
|
| R. erythrocarpum Cov. & Leiberg |
1
|
| R. fasiculatum Sieb. & Zucc. |
11
|
| R. formosanum Hayata |
1
|
| R. glandulosum Grauer |
2
|
| R. heterotrichum C. Meyer |
2
|
| R. himalayense Royle ex Decaisne |
1
|
| R. hirtellum Michx. |
2
|
| R. hispidulum (Jancz,) Pojark. |
1
|
| R. howellii Greene |
9
|
| R. hudsonianum Richards |
9
|
|
R. inerme Rydb.
|
12
|
| R. janczewskii A. Pojark |
3
|
| R. komarovii Pojark. |
17
|
| R. lacustre (Pers.) Poir |
21
|
| R. latifolium Jancz. |
1
|
| R. laxiflorum Pursh |
13
|
| R. leptanthum A. Gray |
3
|
| R. lobbii A. Gray |
6
|
| R. magellanicum Poiret |
4
|
| R. malvaceum |
1
|
| R. mandschuricum (Maxim.)Komorv. |
2
|
| R. maximowiczii Batal. |
3
|
| R. menziesii Pursh |
2
|
| R. mescalerium Cov. |
2
|
| R. meyeri Maxim. |
5
|
| R. missouriense Nutt. |
1
|
| R. montigenum McClatchie |
2
|
| R. multiflorum Kit. Ex Roem. |
6
|
| R. nigrum L. |
147
|
| R. nigrum var. sibericum E. wolf |
2
|
| R. niveum Lindley |
10
|
| R. odoratum H. L. Wendl. |
27
|
| R. orientale Desf. |
9
|
| R. oxyacanthoides L. |
3
|
| R. o. subsp. irriguum |
6
|
| R. o. subsp. setosum |
2
|
| R. palczewskii (Jancz.) Pojark. |
2
|
| R. pauciflorum Turcz. ex Pojark |
2
|
| R. pentlandii Britton |
4
|
| R. petraeum Wulfen |
3
|
| R. petraeum carpathicum (Schultes |
7
|
| R. petraeum atropurpureum |
1
|
| R. pinetorum Greene |
1
|
| R. procumbens Pallas |
2
|
| R. quercetorum Greene |
2
|
| R. roezlii Regel |
3
|
| R. rotundifolium Michx. |
8
|
| R. rubrum L. |
74
|
| R. sanguineum Pursh |
27
|
| R. sp. |
53
|
| R. speciosum Pursh |
1
|
| R. spicatum Robson |
1
|
| R. stenocarpum Maxim |
1
|
| R. tenue Jancz. |
1
|
| R. triste Pallas |
22
|
| R. turbinatum Pojark. |
3
|
| R. uva-crispa L. |
86
|
| R. valdivianum Phil. |
1
|
| R. velutinum Greene |
2
|
| R. velutinum gooddingii (M. Peck) |
2
|
| R. vibirnifolium |
2
|
| R. viscosissimum Pursh |
10
|
| R. watsonianum Koehne |
1
|
| R. wolfii Rothr. |
3
|
| R. x nidigrolaria Bauer |
19
|
| Total |
803
|
Threatened status
Diseases
Table 2. Major diseases and pests of Ribes L.
| Leaf spot, anthracnose |
Pseudopeziza ribis Kleb. |
|
Botrytis cane blight
|
Botrytis ribis Gross. & Dog. |
| Dieback and fruit rot |
Botrytis cinerea Pers. |
|
Septoria leaf spot
|
Mycosphaerella ribis (Fckl.)Feltg. |
| Angular leaf spot |
Cercospora angulata Wint. |
| Coral spot or dieback |
Nectria cinnabarina Tode ex Fr. |
| Powdery mildews |
Sphaerotheca mors-uvae Schw. Microsphaera grossulariae
(Wallr.) |
| White pine blister rust |
Cronartium ribicola J. C. Fischer |
| Cluster cup rust |
Puccinia ribesii-caricis Kleb. |
| Root rots |
Roselina necatrix (Hart.) Berk. Phellinus ribis
(Schum.) Quec. Armillaria mellea Vahlex Fr. |
Viruses
Viruses of Ribes L.
| Black currant reversion virus |
(black currant gall mite vector) |
| Gooseberry veinbanding virus |
Aphid vector |
| Currant mosaic virus |
Nematode vector |
Insects
Insects of Ribes L.
| San Jose scale |
Asipidiotus perniciosus Comst. |
| Clearwing moth |
Synathedon tipuliformis Cl. |
| Currant borer |
Ramosia tipuliformis |
| Currant moth |
Incurvaria capitella Cl. |
| Flat-headed borer |
Chrysobothris mali Horn |
| Black currant leaf midge |
Dasyneura tetensi Rubs. |
| Currant maggot or fruit fly |
Epocha canadensis Loew |
| Currant root louse |
Eriosoma ulmi |
| Black gooseberry borer |
Xylacrius agassizii Lee |
| Fourlined plant bug |
Poecilocapsus lineatus |
| Gooseberry fruit worm |
Zophodia convolutella |
| Gooseberry sawfly |
Nematus ribesii (Scop) |
| Pale-spotted gooseberry sawfly |
N. leucotrochus Hart. |
| Black currant sawfly |
N. olefaciens Benson |
| Currant sawfly |
Pristiophora pallipes Lep. |
| Aphids |
Aphis grossularia Kalt
Hyperomyzus pallidus (H. R. L.)
Nansonovia ribis-nigri (Mosley)
Capitophorus ribis L.
Hyperomyzus lactucae
Cryptomyzus ribis L.
Aphis schneideri Cl. |
| Leafhoppers |
Caresa bubatus Fabr. |
| Common green capsid |
Lygocaris pabulinus |
| Gooseberry inchworm |
Abraxus grossulariata L. |
Mites
| Black currant gall mite |
Cecidophyopsis ribis Westw. |
| Gooseberry mite |
Cecidophyopsis grossulariae Collinge |
| Red spider mite |
Tetranycus telarius L. |
Nematodes
Nematodes of Ribes L.
| Bud and leaf nematode |
Aphelenchoides ritzemabosi (Schw.) Steiner & Buhrer |
Table 3. Gaps in the U. S. national Ribes collection as of January
2000.
| Taxon |
Range |
Qualities |
| R. ussuriensis |
Russia east of the Urals |
white pine blister rust resistance |
| R. nigrum var. sibiricum |
Russia |
white pine blister rust resistance |
| R. sp. |
India, Korea, Russian far-east |
white pine blister rust resistance |
| R. hirtellum |
Eastern United States |
mildew resistance |
| R. oxyacanthoides |
Northern plains of North America |
mildew resistance, spinelessness |
| R. grossularia |
England, Wye College Collections |
large fruited gooseberries |
| R. formosensis |
Taiwan |
mildew resistance |
| R. missouriensis |
Mid-west United States |
frost resistance |
| R. cynosbatti |
Eastern United States |
mildew resistance |
| R. rubrum |
Scandinavia |
red raspberry fruit quality |
| R. klamathense |
Siskiyous, Oregon, United States |
potential endangered taxon |
| R. nevadense |
Great Basin, United States |
flavor components |
| R. vibirnifolium |
Southern California, U. S. |
flavor components |
| R. triste |
Northern North America |
cold hardiness |
| R. divaricatum |
Western North America |
endangered taxon |
| Berisia |
Alpine European currants |
ornamental use |
| Parilla |
Andine Currants |
ornamental use |
III. Rubus
A. Overview
With several exceptions, Rubus is in need of systematic collection and
evaluation. Red, black and purple raspberries and blackberries are the most
important commercial crops derived from this genus in North America and worldwide.
However, wherever Rubus is found there is usually a local species that is important
as a berry crop; for example, Mora (Rubus glaucus) of Andean South
America, Rubus crataegifolius of northeastern Asia, and the arctic raspberries
(R. stellatus, R. arcticus, R. stellarcticus and R.
chamaemorus) of Scandinavia. The only known systematic collection and evaluation
for horticultural purposes in the United States of Rubus in modern times
has been the Rubus, particularly R. ursinus, of western North
America. However, large collections of Rubus were made by L.H. Bailey
and assembled in New York in the first half of the 1900's; these collections
are largely gone, other than in herbariums.
B. Germplasm needs as delineated by regions/species
The following are needs for collection expressed by the Small Fruit CGC.
Rubus idaeus var. strigosus (North America)/ R.
idaeus var. idaeus (Eurasia) from throughout its range. These
two groups of R. idaeus, form the underpinning of the red raspberry industry.
They are distributed throughout northern temperate regions with some notable,
southern remnant populations. While extensive, but haphazard collections representing
North America have recently been assembled by Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada
in British Columbia, this species is not well represented from throughout its
North American and Eurasian distribution. What sampling has been done has lead
to the identification of valuable sources of Phytophthora root rot resistance.
There is special interest in collecting this species from the extremes (wettest,
driest, coldest and hottest) of its range.
Rubus idaeus var idaeus (Eurasia) from the former Soviet Union.
This is a critical, pressing need. The large Russian collection of R. idaeus
is in danger of being lost because of the current economic situation in the
former Soviet Union. While some of this material may be well characterized,
it is only available in Russian, so the information is not readily available
to breeders worldwide.
Rubus occidentalis. The black raspberry industry, concentrated
in Oregon, is entirely reliant on wild selections and turn of the 20th century
developed cultivars. There is very little variability present within the cultivars
that have been developed and it is difficult to tell one from another. This
industry has a strong need for more disease resistant cultivars. No known systematic
collection or evaluation has taken place in this species, which is native to
the mid-Atlantic states and west into the Midwest.
Blackberry Rubus sp. from the eastern U.S. When North America
was settled and opened to agriculture, intercrossing among somewhat distinct
species was greatly accelerated creating a huge interbreeding hybrid population
in Eastern North America. However, there are still types, at least on the edges
of the range that are isolated either physically or temporally form other blackberry
taxa.
A. Species in the sections Alleghenienses and
Arguti (e.g. R. argutus, R. allegheniensis). While
the cultivars are most often tetraploid, the species are usually diploid. While
several breeding programs in the Eastern U.S. have utilized this germplasm this
century the predominant breeding efforts (Univ. of Arkansas and USDA-Carbondale/Beltsville)
have relied on a very small germplasm base. A systematic collection that might
help clarify the taxonomy of these species and serve as a genetic base for further
breeding is highly desirable.
B. Other eastern U.S. species. Rubus canadensis,
R. hispidus, and R. setosus are three northern or northeastern
species that are primarily diploid,. Unfortunately, R. hispidus and R.
setosus tend to have small fruit and are adapted to low pH soils. Rubus
flagellaris and the entire section Flagellares are a complex mix
of polyploids. While the range of R. flagellaris does not extend as far
north as the first three species mentioned, there are representatives of that
section that are found in USDA hardiness zone 3 in northern Minnesota, New England
and Canada. Rubus cuneifolius appears to be tolerant of saline conditions
and in limited enhancement efforts has proven to be a source of excellent flavors
and fruit size. These various blackberry species offer tremendous adaptation
for blackberries adapted to the extreme northern and southern environments of
North America. The northern adapted blackberry species (e.g. R. canadensis,
R. flagellaris) has been used very little, if at all in breeding, have
not been systematically collected, and could provide excellent northern/winter
adaptation for blackberry. Similarly, the southern adapted species (e.g. R.
trivialis), from which at least two cultivars have been developed, need
to be better, collected and characterized.
Asian Rubus sp. The major center of diversity for Rubus
appears to be in this area; China alone is reported to have over 250 species.
Systematic collections were made by M. Thompson et al., in China's Guizhou Province,
and in northeast China, in trips supported by the USDA. These collections are
being evaluated and potentially valuable germplasm incorporated into advanced
breeding material. However, very little other collecting has been done in China,
India and the other Asian countries and the reality is that very little is even
known about most of the species in this region. This is even more true with
the Rubus sp. native to the islands of the South Pacific. Rubus parvifolius
has proven to be a valuable germplasm resource in breeding southern adapted
red raspberries, this species in particular needs to be systematically collected
in Asia including Japan.
Western Europe blackberries. This region represents a center of diversity
for Rubus. However, as with Asia and eastern North America, very little
is known outside of western Europe about the huge diversity present there and
about Rubus taxonomy in this region. In much of this region, human agriculture
has led to the interbreeding of many species leading to a mix that is difficult
to separate or characterize taxonomically. Weber's biosystematic treatment may
make sense, but it is written in German and is not widely accessible. While
Nybom, Edees, Newton and Holub have all contributed to some understanding of
these blackberries, there is no cohesive, compiled, and available treatment
of this group.
C. Germplasm needs as delineated by traits
Shifting gears from regions that need to be collected, there are specific needs
that cannot currently be met with available germplasm. Any collections that
might meet the following needs are highly desired.
1. Disease resistance, particularly for:
a. Phytophthora root rot (Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi) in
raspberry
b. Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) in raspberry
c. Blackberry rosette (Cercosporella rubi)
2. Pest resistance, particularly for:
a. Amphorophora agathonica and A. idaei; particularly new biotypes
that overcome previous resistance
b. Raspberry beetle (Byturus sp.), particularly in Europe, and sap beetles
(Glischrochilus sp.)
c. Caneborers (Agrilus ruficollis and Oberea bimaculata) in eastern
North America
3. Environmental stress tolerance, particularly:
a. tolerance to hot, humid, climates particularly in raspberries
b. tolerance to drought
c. tolerance to high ultraviolet light intensity, particularly in raspberries
d. tolerance to cold winter environments particularly in blackberries
4. New sources of primocane fruiting characteristic in raspberry and blackberry.
5. Adaptation to low-chill environments for all Rubus.
IV. Vaccinium
A. Germplasm collection needs
Vaccinium is a genus in the heath family that includes a wide diversity
of useful and potentially-useful berry-producing plants. The genus has an almost
worldwide distribution, and includes the important crops, blueberry, cranberry,
and lingonberry. The first two of these have their most important wild gene
sources in eastern North America. Western North America is home to a group of
species in Vaccinium section Myrtillus, some of which are highly prized
as wild berries and are gathered and sold as "huckleberries". Both Hawaii and
Alaska have their own indigenous Vaccinium species, and the tropical
highlands of both the New and Old World have a wide diversity of indigenous
Vaccinium species.
Most Vaccinium species are long-lived woody shrubs. Most are cross-pollinated
by insects, are partially to highly self-incompatible, and suffer much from
inbreeding when self pollinated. Populations are highly variable within species
for many traits, and preservation of just a few specimen plants per species
does little to preserve the total diversity in the species. Some of the variability
within species has great horticultural significance. For example, within diploid
V. corymbosum (even when narrowly defined as by Wendel H. Camp), selections
from the area just north of Lake Okeechobee in south Florida are evergreen and
have no chilling requirement whereas those from New Jersey are deciduous with
a very high chilling requirement. Thus, a large collection is needed just to
preserve representatives of the diversity within this one species. A similar
situation prevails with many of the other species.
A major challenge with preserving Vaccinium germplasm is knowing how to deal
with the hundreds of little-known species native to the tropical highlands.
Many of these have potential value in ornamental plantings or in fruit production,
but the security of the germplasm has been assessed for only a few species.
More on-site botanical studies are critically needed to provide information,
and broad-based seed collections should be made to safeguard genetic resources
in these species until they are better understood.
Cultivated blueberries originated from species in section Cyanococcus, which
is native to eastern North America. The three principal cultivated species in
this group are lowbush blueberry, based on V. angustifolium; highbush
blueberry, based on V. corymbosum; and rabbiteye blueberry, based on
V. ashei. Of these, the lowbush germplasm is the most secure, since the
cultivated crop is harvested from thousands upon thousands of diverse individual
clones that were brought into cultivation by applying cultural procedures to
native stands.
The highbush blueberry is widespread on moist, organic soils from central Michigan
to Lake Okeechobee in the south Florida peninsula. Both diploid and tetraploid
races occur. The diploid, evergreen race in south Florida is represented sparsely
or not at all in the germplasm collection, and is highly endangered due to land
pressures from farming and urbanization. A large seed collection should be obtained
from this population for long-term storage. Tetraploid races of V. corymbosum
closely related to the type that was domesticated in New Jersey during the first
decades of the 20th century as "highbush blueberry" extend from north Florida
to central Michigan. Many of the best populations are rapidly being eliminated
or degraded by urbanization, farming, or modern forest management practices.
Large, diverse seed populations collected from the strongest bushes having the
largest berries should be made from each area of the range.
The rabbiteye blueberry, V. ashei, is a vigorous, rhizomatous, tall-growing
hexaploid species native only in restricted areas along rivers in the southeastern
U.S. It is probable that two of the three genomes in V. ashei derive
from V. corymbosum, but what species provided the third genome and exactly
how the hexaploid population formed are still unsolved mysteries. There are
two major races of this species: one in west Florida and adjacent counties in
Alabama, the other in southeast Georgia, centered around the Okefenokee Swamp,
and adjacent areas of Florida and South Carolina. Although not in immediate
danger of extinction, populations of both V. ashei races have diminished
greatly in the past 30 years as a result of farming, forestry, and urbanization.
Large, diverse seed populations should be made for both of these races.
A number of other Vaccinium section Cyanococcus species have been important
in breeding improved rabbiteye and highbush varieties. Two hexaploids, V.
amoenum and V. constablaei will be important to rabbiteye and highbush
breeders of the future. Vaccinium constablaei is native only to the high
mountain balds in the Appalachian mountains and is a source of cold hardiness.
Large, diverse seed populations should be collected and preserved for this species.
Vaccinium darrowii, a diploid, lowbush, evergreen species native to the
Florida peninsula has been crossed with V. corymbosum to develop "southern
highbush" blueberry cultivars that can be grown in subtropical areas to produce
fruit in April and May in the northern hemisphere and in October and November
in the southern. V darrowii on the Lake Wales Ridge at the southern end
of its range is highly endangered. The Ocala National Forest farther north in
the peninsula is an important reservoir of this valuable species, and the management
of this forest should take into account the preservation both of V. darrowii
and of diploid forms of V. corymbosum, both of which will be important
in breeding subtropical highbush blueberries in the future. Vaccinium darrowii
has possible uses in northern climates for improving V. corymbosum fruit
quality.
Two other important indigenous Vaccinium species in the eastern U.S.,
V. arboreum and V. elliottii, are still widespread and abundant.
Any long-range conservation strategy should include a plan to encourage the
use of seedling plants of these attractive native species in home and institutional
landscaping in the areas where they are native.
In the cranberry group (Vaccinium section Oxycoccus), the USDA National
Clonal Germplasm Repository species holdings include 123 accessions of V. macrocarpon
(large-fruited cranberry), 3 accessions of V. microcarpon (small-fruited
cranberry), and 41 accessions of V. oxycoccus (2x/4x wild cranberry).
Vaccinium microcarpon and V. oxycoccus are under-represented at
present. Vaccinium macrocarpon is better represented. Areas deserving
further collection of V. macrocarpon include southern Canada, Michigan,
Minnesota, and West Virginia. The entire area should be re-sampled to obtain
broad-based seed collections. Areas deserving further collection for V. oxycoccus
include Alaska and the region south of Hudson Bay. For V. oxycoccus special
consideration should be given to areas which have previously been determined
to harbor 2x genotypes (most V. oxycoccus are 4x). The 2x types are particularly
valuable for the possibilities of introgression into cultivated V. macrocarpon,
which is also diploid. V. oxycoccus also exists in Scandinavia and Europe,
and further collections should be made in these areas. Because of the Federal
Wetlands Act, there is probably less threat to native cranberry sites than there
is to native sites of other species. Guidelines should be made for collection
to optimize genetic diversity in the final preserved accessions. Appropriate
sampling strategies should be developed for sampling multiple locations in a
region, sampling different individuals within a site, and in final compositing
of seed from a site.
The lingonberry (V. vitis-idaea), also known as cowberry, partridgeberry,
and mountain cranberry, is closely related to the cranberry, and the berries
taste relatively alike. The plants are perennial, evergreen, dwarf shrubs and
are widely distributed in north-temperate, boreal, and subarctic regions. The
native range of the lingonberry includes areas in Alaska, Scandinavia and other
parts of northern Europe and Asia. Lingonberry diversity has been studied at
the Swedish University of Agriculture at Balsgard. Lingonberry cultivars have
been developed in Sweden, Germany, and in Wisconsin. Wild lingonberry populations
are variable in nearly all important horticultural traits. Large, diverse seed
collections should be made from each geographical area within the range to provide
seed for longterm storage and to supply short-term requests.
B. Germplasm preservation
Vaccinium germplasm can be preserved in situ by acquiring, managing,
or preserving the natural areas in which they are growing. This could be done
in conjunction with State and National forests and wilderness areas, private
organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, and with private landholders.
Because so much Vaccinium germplasm is indigenous to the United States,
cooperative programs to manage Vaccinium germplasm in situ should
be made a model for how indigenous germplasm could be managed in other countries.
In collections, Vaccinium germplasm can be preserved either as seed
material or as clones. For preserving large amounts of genetic diversity far
into the future, seed preservation is by far the most effective and inexpensive.
During the next 50 to 100 years, breeders will probably still have much Vaccinium
germplasm available to them directly from the forest. Beyond 100 years, however,
germplasm banks may be the only source for some species. Thus, strategies to
preserve a vast wealth of germplasm far into the future should be given priority
over storage of a few hundred particular horticultural clones for the next 100
years. Vaccinium seeds are very small and longlived if stored properly.
If properly collected and stored, a particular population, for example, diploid,
lowchill, evergreen V. corymbosum from the south Florida peninsula, could
be collected as a highly diverse seed population and stored at low cost. Every
50 years, a 1-acre isolated field planting containing 5,000 or more plants could
produce open-pollinated seed to renew this seed population with little loss
of diversity for a cost of about $20,000. If two populations of this type were
renewed each year on a 50-year cycle, 100 highly diverse populations could be
maintained in perpetuity for only $40,000 per year plus seed storage costs.
This would be far more useful to future breeders than maintaining a few hundred
genotypes of each species as clones. Examples of populations that could be saved
in this way by seed storage and renewal might be: Population 1: Diploid, evergreen,
highbush clones from the southern end of the species range in the Florida peninsula;
Population 2: Tetraploid, deciduous to semi-deciduous highbush blueberries from
cypress swamps in north Florida (the southern limits of the tetraploid V.
corymbosum range); Population 3: Large-fruited, vigorous highbush blueberries
from sandy-organic soils from southeast Georgia to southeastern North Carolina;
Population 4: the best highbush blueberries from the swamps of southern New
Jersey, representing the type that contributed most heavily to the founding
populations used to start the USDA highbush breeding program from 1900 to 1920;
Population 5: Coldhardy highbush blueberry from the northern extremes of the
range in Michigan. It would probably require no more than 10 such populations
to preserve a working capital of germplasm of the commercially most important
blueberry species in the world. Other populations could be devoted to conserving
highbush relatives such as V. elliottii, V. constablaei, V.
ashei, V. amoenum, V. myrsinites, V. darrowii, V.
tenellum, etc. A total of 100 populations would preserve most of the species
of principal current concern. A committee of blueberry breeders and population
geneticists should be appointed to design the collection strategy and define
the populations.
Clonal collections should also be maintained, but these should not be the primary
focus of the Vaccinium germplasm preservation program.
C. Utilization and Enhancement.
There are several reasons for preserving genetic diversity. Species can be
saved which may someday be studied to better understand evolution, ecology,
and other aspects of the natural world. Diverse populations can later be examined
as sources of drugs or other valuable products. Species can serve as sources
of genes, which, through genetic engineering, may someday be useful by transfer
to crops such as corn, wheat, rice, and soya. Some of the still-undomesticated
Vaccinium species have potential to make new domesticated crops in the
future. Wild relatives of blueberries, cranberries, and lingonberries will be
needed in the future to develop better cultivars of these three crops.
Germplasm enhancement is best accomplished as an integral part of a breeding
program whose end product is a finished cultivar that can be grown by farmers
in a particular production area. In utilizing a germplasm source for a desirable
trait such as resistance to Phytophthora root rot, cold-hardiness, low chilling,
improved fruit qualities etc., the breeder needs to have a wide range of gene
sources from which to choose because they must consider the other traits that
will come along with the desired trait when the gene source is crossed into
the elite gene pool from which cultivars are being developed. Screening and
cataloging large germplasm collections to find clones that most strongly exemplify
this or that virtue, without regard for their other features, is not particularly
useful to the breeder. Although breeding programs may or may not be active at
present for some of the taxonomic groups, failure to preserve sufficient diversity
will preclude any future development of these potentially valuable crop plants.
|
|
|