GRIN Site Logo
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
ARS Home  About Us  Help top nav spacer Contact Us
Email this pageEmail this page   


Search GRIN
Request Germplasm
Crop Germplasm Committees
Repository Home Pages
 National Plant Germplasm System

Phaseolus Crop Germplasm Committee Report

1996 Update

Contributors to the 1996 update:

P. Gepts, Phaseolus CGC Chair
P. Miklas, Phaseolus CGC Secretary
M. Brick
C. Chase
D. Coyne
R. Hannan
P. McClean
J. Myers
J. Steadman


A. World Production 3
B. U.S. Production 3
C. Domestic Use: 5
D. Export Markets: 5
E. Bean Germplasm 6

A. Collection: P. Gepts 7
B. Evaluation: J. Steadman and D. Coyne 8
C. Enhancement: P. Miklas 9
D. Preservation: R. Hannan 10
E. Genetic Stocks Collection: J. Myers 13
F. Phaseolus Electronic Databases P. McClean 14

A. Trends in Genetic Diversity within Different Production Regions: M. Brick and J. Myers 17
B. Cytoplasmic Genetic Diversity: C. Chase 20

A. Collection: P. Gepts 21
B. Evaluation: J. Steadman and D. Coyne 22
C. Enhancement: P. Miklas 23
D. Preservation: R. Hannan 23
E. Genetic Stocks Collection: J. Myers 24
F. Phaseolus Electronic Databases P. McClean 24




A. World Production

Phaseolus dry beans are the leading grain legume crop with an annual world production of 20 million metric tons (mmt) or 30% of the total world pulse production of 60 mmt in 1994 (Parker 1995b). World figures for green bean production are not individually available hence are included in the above figure. Green beans are becoming an increasingly important crop in developing countries as consumers demand more diversity in their daily food consumption and farmers seek additional sources of income.

The major dry bean producers are Brazil with 2.8 mmt, Mexico with 1.0 mmt, the U.S. with 1.3 mmt, and Europe at 0.8 mmt (1994 figures; Parker 1995b). Beans play a major role in the diets of people throughout America and Africa with cumulative production of 1.1 mmt in other Latin American countries and 1.8 mmt in E. Africa. Although Brazil is the leading producer of beans, it consumes all its production. The U.S. is the leading export nation marketing 40% (0.4 mmt) of all dry bean production overseas while Argentina exports all (99.5%) of its production of 0.25 mmt.

B. U.S. Production

Phaseolus dry beans are planted on 2.0 (1.6-2.2) million acres in the U.S. (USDA 1: 1994 figure with range over 1989-1994). Production reached around 29 million hundred weight (cwt) annually, ranging from a low of 22 million in 1993 to a high of almost 34 million cwt in 1991. This production has a farm gate value at between $400 to $675 million depending on the season and the availability of export markets (USDA 2: period of 1987-1992). In 1995, the major production states of dry beans ranked in order of production are: North Dakota, Michigan, Nebraska, California, Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota, Washington, Wyoming, and New York recognizing that there are seasonal changes (USDA 3). Average yields range from 13 cwt/a under rainfed conditions in the Midwest to highs of 22 cwt/a under irrigated production in California and the Northwest.

Dry bean classes are categorized based on differences in seed size, shape, and color. The white seeded classes include navy and great northern beans; mottled classes include pinto and cranberry beans while the remainder have color included in the market class name. Seed size varies from small navy and black turtle beans (2200 to 3000 seed per pound or 15-20 g per 100 seeds) to medium-sized pinto, great northern, pink, and red Mexican beans (1200 to 1400 seeds per pound or 32-38 g per 100 seeds) to large-seeded kidney and cranberry beans (800 to 1000 seeds per pound or 45-57 g per 100 seeds). In addition to the obvious seed trait differences, other major differences in growth habit, disease reaction, and adaptation exist. The U.S. produces 9 commercial market classes of dry beans ranked here in order of their 1994 production: Pinto, Navy, Black Turtle Soup, Kidney (light and dark), Great Northern, Red Mexican (or Small Reds), Pink, Cranberry, and Small White (USDA 3). Pinto beans replaced the navy bean as the number one market class in the late 1980s. The other classes have maintained a fairly consistent annual production with exception of the Black Turtle Soup class which rose dramatically in the 1980-81 season as a result of export markets. Subsequently, Black Turtle Soup consumption has sharply increased since the beginning of the 1990s presumably because of the popularity of ethnic foods (Lucier 1995a). The different bean classes are produced in localized production areas within specific states listed. Navy bean production is concentrated in Michigan and the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota; pintos mainly in Colorado, North Dakota, and Idaho; great northerns primarily in Nebraska; pinks in Idaho, Washington, and California; and red Mexican beans in Idaho and Washington. The localized intense production of market classes of different evolutionary origins (Table 1) potentially decreases the risk of genetic vulnerability within a production region or state. For example, in California the two main classes (kidneys and pinks) belong to different gene pools (Andean and Middle American, respectively). In addition, these common bean classes are grown with other bean classes belonging to other species such as lima bean (P. lunatus), cowpea or blackeyed-pea (Vigna unguiculata), and garbanzo bean or chickpea (Cicer arietinum).

Table 1. Evolutionary origin of major dry bean classes in the U.S. (after Brown et al. 1982, Gepts et al. 1988, Singh et al. 1991)
Dry bean class Gene pool Race
Pinto Middle American Durango
Navy Middle American Mesoamerica
Black Turtle Soup Middle American Mesoamerica
Kidneys (light and dark) Andean Nueva Granada
Great Northern Middle American Durango
Red Mexican (or Small Reds) Middle American Durango
Pink Middle American Durango
Cranberry Andean Chile
Small White Middle American Mesoamerica

Common bean cultivars belonging to the same race are more likely to be vulnerable to the same pathogen strain than cultivars belonging to different races and a fortiori to different gene pools.

Snap beans are grown for processing or the fresh market. In 1995, the snap bean acreage for processing in the U.S. was estimated at 218,000 acres (USDA 4). For the period of 1990-1992, the production value ranged between $ 112-144 million annually (USDA 2). The major production states in 1995 were Wisconsin with 68,000 acres, Oregon with 23,600 acres, New York with 21,400 acres, and Michigan with 21,500 acres (USDA 5). In 1995, the fresh market acreage under production was estimated at 89,600 acres (USDA 4). The 1992 value of the fresh-market crop was estimated at $138 million (USDA 2). Florida accounts for about a third of the U.S. fresh market snap bean production with most of the remainder in California, Georgia, and Tennessee (USDA 4).

C. Domestic Use:

Approximately 80% of total U.S. dry bean production is consumed nationally (Lucier 1995b). Over 95% of navy beans are canned as baked bean products, whereas over 80% of the pintos are sold as a dry pack commodity. The canned pinto usually is marketed as refried beans. The majority of kidney beans are canned in brine in both small and large institutional packs for use in salad bars, dark red kidneys being preferred in the northern U.S. and light reds in the south. Great northerns are canned in brine, pinks in spicy barbeque sauce, and red Mexicans in chili sauce although a portion of all of these classes are marketed as a dry pack commodity. Dry bean consumption has increased in the U.S. by 40% over the last fifteen years (Lucier 1995a).

The recognition that the soluble fiber (pectins) content of dry bean seed can reduce cholesterol has been documented in clinical studies conducted by Dr. J. Anderson of the HCF Nutritional Research Foundation, Lexington, KY. He has demonstrated that 100 g of dry beans consumed daily lowers total cholesterol by 19% but more importantly it lowers the low density lipoproteins by 24% while preserving the desirable high density lipoprotein fraction.

Processed snap beans are either canned (75%) or frozen (25%). Since this production is concentrated, variety selection is decided as part of the contract based on quality and maturity specifications. The varieties preferred for fresh market generally have more fiber in the pods which help retain shape during shipping and marketing. A small percentage of the fresh market types are traditional string (half runner) bean types.

D. Export Markets:

The diversity in seed size, shape, and color permits the targeting of commercial classes to specific regional and cultural market needs overseas. Hence, an increasing share of U.S. produced dry beans is now targeted at export markets. Currently 20% of U.S. production is exported; red kidneys average 25%, great northerns average 33%, and 50% of the navy beans are exported (Lucier 1995b). Cranberry types are grown exclusively for export notably in Italy. Navy beans are marketed in the UK, great northerns in Europe and North Africa, pinto and black beans in Mexico, Dominican Republic, Venezuela, and Brazil. Argentina is the dominant competitor in the great northern and black bean markets whereas Chile, Canada, and Australia compete in navy bean markets. Successful overseas marketing is directly linked to the availability of PL480 funds directed towards beans in those countries where foreign currency is scarce. Exports of beans to Africa are likely to increase (Parker 1995a).

E. Bean Germplasm

Genetic diversity is a prerequisite for all plant improvement programs and certain significant germplasm sources have played a major role in bean breeding programs. The N203 source of root rot resistance from the PI203958 line (Silbernagel and Hannan, 1992); halo blight resistance from PI150414; the dominant Are gene for resistance to six races of anthracnose found in the Cornell breeding line 49-242 originally from Venezuela; the inhibitor I gene, described by Ali (1950) in Corbett Refugee, conditions hypersensitive resistance to all strains of bean common mosaic virus; the Mexico 309 gene block and the Mexico 235 and Aurora gene for resistance to many U.S. rust races was identified by Stavely (1984) and Stavely and Grafton (1985); and blight resistance introgressed from the tepary bean by Honma (1956) are a few examples of widely used germplasm sources. More recently, R. Stavely has identified new sources of rust resistance in the Pullman PI collection. A high frequency of resistance was found among accessions from Guatemala. PI 181954, of the Mesoamerican gene pool, is the original donor of the bc-3 gene for resistance against all know strains of the Bean Common Mosaic Virus, including the necrotic strains (Johnson et al. 1996).

Interestingly, novel genetic variability created using mutations has played a major role in the alteration of growth habit in navy beans. The determinate bush variety Sanilac was the product of a X-ray mutation breeding program while the recent architectural upright indeterminate varieties like C-20 all have utilized the NEP-2 variety developed through a chemical mutation program in Costa Rica (Moh, 1971).

Recent evidence for genetic resistance to weevils implicates the role of the unique seed storage protein arcelin (Osborn, et al., 1988). First identified in wild bean relatives from Mexico, arcelin does not exist in the cultivated Phaseolus vulgaris, suggesting that wild beans could represent a valuable source of additional genetic diversity.


Different types of molecular markers have been used to further characterize the organization of genetic diversity in common bean. These markers include RFLPs for single copy genomic sequences (Becerra Velásquez and Gepts 1994), RFLPs for M13-related sequences (Sonnante et al. 1994; Stockton and Gepts 1994), RAPDs (Freyre et al. 1996), and AFLPs (Tohme et al. 1996). These studies have further clarified the relationships among various segments of the common bean gene pool and documented the reduction in genetic diversity during its evolution.

The categorization of Phaseolus germplasm into six races within two primary centers of origin; the Jalisco, Durango and Mesoamerican races within the Mesoamerican gene pool and Nueva Granada, Peru, and Chilean races within the Andean gene pool, has contributed immensely to our knowledge about the genetic diversity within the Phaseolus collection (Singh et al., 1991a,b). This classification of the Phaseolus germplasm should enable more efficient utilization and access of the germplasm by bean breeders and researchers. This information also provides us with a better understanding of the genetic incompatibility factors which prevent good general combining ability between beans from each center and in fact for many cases results in lethality of F1 hybrid plants (Singh and Gutiérrez 1984; Gepts and Bliss 1985; Koinange and Gepts 1992). The significance of this concept is that these and other incompatibilities reduce the effective introgression between germplasm from each center.

Studies in a common bean pathogen, Phaeoisariopsis griseola, causal agent of angular leafspot, has revealed a remarkably similar arrangement of genetic diversity in the pathogen and the host, namely both show a divergence into Mesoamerican and Andean components. The Andean strains are more compatible (i.e. more pathogenic) with the Andean hosts and vice-versa for the Mesoamerican genotypes (Guzmán et al. 1995). Similar distributions of genetic diversity appear to exist in the anthracnose and rust pathogens (see below).

Within the domestic market classes, kidney and cranberry beans belong to the Andean center whereas the pinto, small red, navy, pink, black, and great northern beans are Middle American in origin (Table 1). Recent evidence reveals that snap beans have more Andean than Mesoamerican germplasm in their background (Weeden 1984; Gepts and Bliss 1988; Skroch and Nienhuis, 1995).

Low to medium levels of outcrossing in beans have been reported to occur in California and Puerto Rico (Wells et al. 1988; Brunner and Beaver 1989). Outcrossing has caused delays in the release of certain bean cultivars and will need further monitoring to confirm safe isolation distances in order to maintain the genetic integrity of pure line increases. An important factor in determining levels of outcrossing appears to be the type of pollinator and actual numbers of pollinators. To date, all estimates of outcrossing in common bean have been obtained outside the centers of origin and distribution of wild beans. It is possible that, in these centers, specific pollinators that have coevolved with the bean plant could be responsible for higher levels of cross-pollination than those measured outside the centers of origin.

An exhaustive list of all germplasm activities is not possible in this report. The Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative, however, is an excellent source for identifying bean researchers and some of their current research activities.

A. Collection: P. Gepts

Recent collection trips include the following countries and collectors: Ecuador and Bolivia -- Gepts and Debouck in 1990 and 1994, respectively (Debouck et al. 1993, Freyre et al. 1996); Argentina -- Steadman in 1995 and 1996.

The collections by Gepts and Debouck were focused on wild Phaseolus given the dearth of these materials in germplasm collections (for an example, see the Pullman collection below: Table 2). Both collections led to a better understanding of the ecological distribution of the species. The Ecuador exploration was particularly remarkable because it allowed the identification of a "missing link" between the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools (Debouck et al. 1993). Subsequent DNA sequence analyses of phaseolin genes suggest that the wild P. vulgaris populations of Ecuador and northern Peru could actually be the ancestral populations from the entire species is derived (Kami et al. 1995).

The collections by J. Steadman in 1995 and 1996 were focused on gathering materials pertinent to a study of coevolution between the bean host and the rust pathogen. In both years wild and landrace materials were collected.

B. Evaluation: J. Steadman and D. Coyne

From information presented at the 1995 BIC/NDBC and the W-150 Regional Research Project meeting as well as the most recent Bean Improvement Cooperative Annual Reports, it would appear that the most active area of evaluation is with Andean/Middle American germplasm comparisons. As long as research publications are the primary criteria for promotion and tenure at public institutions and funding for this type of activity is poor, PI/germplasm testing activity will continue to be somewhat limited, except where a researcher is looking for resistance to a particular pathogen.

Many reports on screening for stress tolerance (including diseases and pests) involve breeding lines and common cultivars. CIAT recently has reported on screening Phaseolus vulgaris races for water stress and low soil fertility tolerance and anthracnose and angular leaf spot resistance. J. R. Stavely has completed resistance testing a sampling of 3500 PIs and now has 31 with broad resistance to about 66 races of rust. These PIs are being tested in other countries and incorporated into US bean market class germplasm releases at present. Andean bean race specificity has been reported for the rust pathogen while Andean/Middle American specificities are known for both the anthracnose and angular leaf spot fungal pathogens. In particular the research groups of Michel Dron and Claire Neema at the University of Paris XI are conducting in-depth studies on the variability of host and anthracnose pathogens in Latin America.

New sources of germplasm from landrace/wild bean populations in Dominican Republic, Honduras, Malawi, Bolivia and Argentina await testing in the US. These collections have been evaluated in their country of origin for some traits and the data indicate that characteristics exist in these materials that would benefit US breeding programs.

The evaluation of cultigens, wild species, and interspecific populations for traits useful for enhancing dry bean germplasm continues. Miklas et al. (1994b), Miklas and Santiago (1996), and Salgado et al. (1994) have screened tepary bean PIs for multiple disease resistance and adaptability to different environments. The multivariate cluster analyses of cultivar (McClean et al., 1993) and landrace (Singh et al., 1991b) P. vulgaris accessions based on agroecological, isozyme, seed protein and/or DNA marker data are helping to identify: i) genetic bottlenecks (Garvin and Weeden, 1994), ii) areas of extreme genetic diversity, and iii) strategies for attempting, through wide crosses, to increase yield and other quantitatively inherited traits of relatively low heritability (e.g., Singh and Urrea 1995; Urrea and Singh 1996).

Many of the Phaseolus accessions maintained in collections throughout the world are photoperiod sensitive and/or have Type IV growth habits (especially those of races Jalisco and Peru) making them nearly impossible to evaluate in temperate climates. These accessions remain an untapped source of genetic diversity and useful traits for enhancement of temperate snap and dry bean germplasm. A program has been initiated by USDA/ARS scientists in Mayagüez, PR and Prosser, WA to convert photoperiod sensitive germplasm into day-length neutral phenotypes for evaluation and use in temperate regions.

C. Enhancement: P. Miklas

Disease, pest, and abiotic stress resistance of dry and snap beans continue to be improved through introgression of novel and distinct genetic resistance resources into adapted phenotypes. Specifically USDA/ARS scientists like Dr. Stavely continue to actively pyramid new resistance genes identified from PI lines with existing genes like Ur-3, Ur-4, Ur-5, and Ur-6 to combat the variable rust pathogen (Stavely and McMillan, Jr. 1992; Stavely et al. 1992, 1994). Stavely is currently combining resistances to other diseases like bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV), common bacterial blight and bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) with pyramided resistance to rust to obtain multiple disease resistant germplasm (Stavely and Silbernagel, 1993). He is developing germplasm with specific combinations of resistances for targeted areas, for instance, (1) rust and BGMV resistances combined in McCaslan pole beans for southeastern U.S. snap bean production; (2) rust and common bacterial blight resistances combined in great northern, pinto and navy dry beans for eastern Colorado and the Midwestern production states of Nebraska, North Dakota, and Michigan; and (3) rust and BCMV resistances combined so beans can be produced more effectively in the seed production states of Idaho and Washington were the virus is problematic.

New small red (formerly red mexican) beans with upright architecture, good canning quality traits, and various disease resistances have been developed by Hosfield et al. (1995). He used recurrent and pedigree selection to capture useful traits from a wide array of tropical and temperate dry bean germplasm. Recently, Miklas et al. (1994a) developed multiple disease resistant dry bean germplasm from P. vulgaris x P. coccineus interspecific populations.

Freytag et al. (1982) successfully introgressed wild P. coccineus into cultivated vulgaris and released germplasm line XR235 which conditions resistance to common blight. Active work continues with the introgression of both wild and cultivated tepary (P. acutifolius) into cultivated vulgaris to transfer traits as diverse as blight resistance (Scott and Michaels, 1992), drought tolerance and reproductive fitness under high temperatures.

The extensive use of PI203958 for Fusarium root rot resistance by Burke (Silbernagel and Hannan, 1992) resulted in the development of 11 dry bean cultivars in 3 commercial classes. The tropical black bean A55 has been used by Dr. Silbernagel (USDA/ARS, 1994) as a novel source of root rot resistance and I gene for enhancement of pinto bean germplasm.

Enhancement is often a slow process. PI150414 was recognized as a source of resistance to halo blight in 1966 by Patel and Walker. This resistance is only now being incorporated into commercially acceptable snap bean cultivars. The advent of the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) as a genetic marker for indirect selection will undoubtedly facilitate: i) introgression of qualitative and perhaps quantitative resistance factors, ii) development of multiple disease resistance, and iii) building of gene pyramids for multiple resistance against a single race of pathogen. Tightly-linked RAPD markers already exist for rust, anthracnose, BCMV, BGMV, and common bacterial blight resistance genes and QTLs (Haley et al., 1994b; Kelly, 1995; Miklas et al., 1993; Nodari et al., 1993). The placement of these RAPD markers and associated genes/QTLs on integrated linkage maps (Gepts et al. 1993; Freyre et al. 1996; Phaseolus - Vigna Genome mapping information) will enable breeders to develop strategies for combining resistance genes in coupling phase linkage or located on different chromosomes versus breaking (recombining) resistance genes linked in repulsion.

The works above were critically backed by the ability to identify new sources of resistance in the current PI collection. The availability of a Phaseolus core collection should facilitate further identification of new resistance genes from the PI collection and flag regions or pockets of germplasm where genetic variability may exist for such traits.

D. Preservation: R. Hannan

The USDA, ARS National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) Phaseolus collection is maintained at the Western Regional Plant Introduction Station, Pullman, Washington. As of the end of 1996, the collection totaled nearly 13,500 accessions, 1,650 of which are listed in the W6 category and are pending decision for PI assignment (Table 2). The biggest increases in W6 numbers are among the Phaseolus species, resulting from revived accessions from the old Oliver Norvell collection. As these are being grown, sometimes from only two to three viable seed, they are being processed through the virus clean-up program, as well as getting some confirmation on their taxonomic identity. A large part of the W6, Phaseolus vulgaris material (around 600 accessions) is a collection from Eastern Europe that has not been dealt with yet, and another 407 W6 accessions are from the Honduras collection sent to Pullman by P. Miklas. The Honduras material will be addressed first, but there is apparently a lot of redundancy in this collection and this is being sorted out.

Table 2. Status of the Phaseolus collection at W-6, 1996
Species Total no. of accessions Number of accessions available Accessions with W6 no.
acutifolius 195 116 (59%) 42
angustissimus 3 2 (66%) 0
atropurpureus 0 0 10
coccineus 461 313 (68%) 43
filiformis 19 15 (79%) 1
glabellus 4 2 (50%) 3
grayanus 1 0 0
griseus 0 0 5
hybrid 79 79 (100%) 0
jaliscanus 3 0 0
leptostachyus 26 21 (81%) 17
lignosus 1 0 0
lunatus 1054 1000 (95%) 41
macrolepis 1 0 0
maculatus 2 1 0
micranthus 1 0 0
microcarpus 18 4 (22%) 3
oligospermus 1 0 0
parvulus 2 1 0
pedicellatus 1 0 0
pluriflorus 2 0 0
polystachyus 6 5 (83%) 0
ritensis 6 2 0
salicifolius 1 0 0
sp. 211 17 (8%) 189
stenolobus 5 2 5
vulgaris var. aborigineus 84 49 (81%) 32
vulgaris (cultivated) 11,228 9,911 (88%) 1,238
xanthotrichus 3 0 2
Total (28 species) 13418 11540 (86%) 1631

Primary efforts have been focused on accession availability and back up at NSSL. General increases are done in 19,000 ft.2 of greenhouse space at the Pullman and Central Ferry locations. In concert with the seed increase program, all of the Phaseolus grown goes through the virus clean-up program to eliminate seed borne viruses from the distribution samples. Financial, physical and human resources have been provided to expand the virus testing program to accomplish this formidable task. Virus testing is conducted on all bean plants grown. The protocol for this program is available upon request. Although special problems exist in increasing some accessions of the Phaseolus collection due to photoperiod sensitivity (short day-length requirements) or necessity for insect pollinators, WRPIS has discontinued off-site increase of this genus for all but a few species. All accessions are grown under greenhouse conditions and if necessary, flowers are hand-tripped or hand-cross pollinated within an accession. Discontinuation of contract seed production was deemed necessary due to the level of outcrossing in the off-site increases.

Distribution ranges from 1300-2000 accessions per year. It is important to note that the trend over the last few years has shown that requests for bean germplasm are much more specific and refined. For example, recent requests have averaged only around 30 accessions per request. This trend is attributed to the ability to identify new sources of resistance in the current PI collection. The availability of a Phaseolus core collection should facilitate further identification of additional resistance genes from different PIs and regions where genetic variability exists for such traits.

In 1994, a subcommittee of the Phaseolus CGC was formed to establish guidelines for an approach to develop a core subset for the Phaseolus collection. In subsequent meetings and communications, it was decided that we would begin Phaseolus vulgaris, and partition this large collection into logical sub-groups that would be of a reasonable size that the core concept could be tested. The sub-groupings consisted of the P. vulgaris collection from Mexico as one, and the combined P. vulgaris collections from the Latin American countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia as another.

The CGC started with these two sub-groupings to test the following hypothesis: Will a stratified logarithmic selection based on a defined set of selection criteria be more efficient than a complete random selection in producing a subset that represents the widest range of variability (diversity) with the fewest number of accessions? Since the best and most complete set of morphological data for the NPGS bean collection was the seed characteristic data, the selection criteria were: i) geographical origin, ii) seed color (primary), iii) seed pattern, and iv) seed size.

A tentative core subset has been selected for these two sub-groups. Base statistics for each are available. Furthermore, a randomly selected core with the same number of accessions as are in the stratified core has been selected. A list of the accessions in each of these cores is available upon request.

Outside of the NPGS, collections of breeding materials and exotic germplasm are maintained by state, federal, and private sector plant breeders. Efforts by the collection curator continue to locate these collections, identify unique and/or valuable genotypes, and incorporate the material into the NPGS, especially as plant breeders retire.

E. Genetic Stocks Collection: J. Myers

The genetics stocks collection as a subset of the overall Phaseolus collection is a relatively recent effort to preserve unique genetic material used in fundamental studies of the bean genome. Because of the newness of this effort, relatively few marker lines are available. At present, 25 accessions in the Plant Introduction collection are flagged as genetic stocks. These are lines that contain well characterized genes for various traits. Most are morphological markers that affect foliage or pods. One flower color mutant and one seed coat color stock are included. An additional 8 chromosome translocation stocks are preserved in the collection. Other material already exists in the collection that could be designated as genetics stocks, but awaits thorough classification before being flagged. Sets of host differentials for distinguishing pathotypes or near-isogenic lines and other unique germplasm could be incorporated as 'genetic stock-like' materials and flagged accordingly.

Phaseolus Electronic Databases P. McClean

The BeanGenes Database

Recent efforts have been made to develop internet accessible database that are of interest to researchers in the field of bean genetics and production. BeanGenes, a database dedicated to

Phaseolus and Vigna research, first went on-line in January 1995. Initial funding for the project came from a sub-contract through Dr. Randy Shoemaker, USDA/ARS, Iowa State University. The primary funding source was the USDA Plant Genome project.

Currently, the majority of BeanGenes data is stored in the ACeDB software application. This is a frequently used plant genome database application. Richard Durbin (MRC, England) and Jean

Thierry-Mieg (CNRS, France) initially developed ACeDB (an acronym for A C. elegans database) to archive information about Caenorhabditis elegans. The database runs under the X-Windows environment on machines utilizing some flavor of a UNIX operating system. To access the database as an X-window application, the user must login on the server. Alternatively, a user can obtain a copy of the database and install it on a local X-Windows server. Remote users will need to access the database from a computer running a form of X-Windows. The database can be accessed from any personal computer or MacIntosh computer which has X-Windows

emulation software.

The data base is populated with several classes of data. Molecular mapping data contains all of the mapping information for the two RFLP maps developed by Vallejos et al. (1992) and Gepts et al. (1993) and the RFLP/RAPD map of Dron and colleagues (Adam-Blondon et al. 1994). Nevin Young, University of Minnesota, has contributed RFLP map data of mung bean (Vigna radiata) and cowpea (V. unguiculata). Associated with each molecular map are loci and probe data. The loci data describes the molecular location and the probes or RAPDs used to define the locus. The probe data provides specific details about a given probe.

All of the genetic information compiled by Dr. Mark Bassett at the University of Florida is included in the database. This collection describes all of the genes, along with their symbols and descriptions accepted by the bean community. This list is identical to the recently published list [Bassett (1993) Ann. Report of Bean Imp. Coop. 36:vi]. References to each gene are included.

The pathologies of bean are described in detail. The symptoms, causal agents, and suggested solutions are described. Known sources of resistance and the genes that provide that resistance are described. The taxonomy of fungal, bacterial and viral pathogen is also included. Images of many of the pathologies provided by CIAT can also be viewed.

Data from the GenBank database was collected for all DNA and protein sequence submissions of Phaseolus and Vigna species. References for these sequences are also included.

Information is available for many dry bean cultivars. This includes market class, pedigree, release date and developer of each cultivar. Resistance alleles that the cultivar is known to possess are also included.

Finally, the database lists the address of many individuals working in the field of bean research.

Accessing the ACeDB Version of BeanGenes

The BeanGenes database can be accessed in two manners. For those users with X-Windows capability, a login on the BeanGenes server can be established. If you would like to have an account on the BeanGenes machine contact Phil McClean at mcclean@beangenes.cws.ndsu. and an account will be established.

The ACeDB form of BeanGenes can be searched on the Agricultural Genome WWW Server. The National Agricultural Library Genome Informatic Group developed a WWW interface to the ACeDB databases. To connect to the WWW version of the BeanGenes data base go to This WWW site can be accessed by such client software as Netscape, MS Explorer and Mosaic. Once the site is reached, the database can be navigated using standard point-and-click techniques.

The BeanGenes WWW Site

A BeanGenes WWW site is in operation. The address for the site is: The data in the database is listed under "The BeanGenes Database" section of the homepage. You can directly link to the Agricultural Genome WWW Server by clicking on "WWW Version of BeanGenes".

The WWW site also has two other data sets that are not found in the ACeDB-based version. A summary of all of the variety trial data from the dry bean production regions of the United States can be accessed by selecting the "United States Common Bean Variety Trial Data" entry. Also included is a list of the pedigrees of many dry bean cultivars. To view this data in both a textual and graphical format select the "Dry Bean Pedigrees" entry. Most recently, a Java program was developed that displays the pedigrees of common bean in the traditional tree diagram.

Links to other sites related to beans are listed under the "Links to Other Phaseolus/Vigna Sites" section. Finally, links to WWW sites containing information relevant to growing beans can be found under the "Bean Production Information" section.

Other Phaseolus Databases

Although BeanGenes is most significant database effort in the US, other exist throughout the world. BeanRef is a database developed by Mario Nenno, a graduate student in the Division of Cell Biology at the University of Kaiserslautern in Germany. This WWW ( site is rich in links to on-line resources in the Phaseolus research field. The National Plant Germplasm System (GRIN) can be searched directly on-line via the WWW at This is a direct link to the material held by the germplasm repositories.

Valuable production information is also available. Users can contract Extension Service computers at: North Dakota State University ( for specific production information for dry bean; Colorado State University ( to download bean production guides; University of Arkansas ( greenbean.html) for snap bean production information; and the University of Florida ( for a description of how to produce a variety of beans used as vegetable crops.


Botanical, archaeological, and biochemical data suggests that domestication of common bean in the Americas occurred in two distinct regions. This evidence indicates that domestication took place as separate events in both South and Middle America a few thousand years ago (Kaplan 1994). Molecular marker analysis clearly shows that domestication has induced a strong bottleneck in genetic diversity (Gepts et al. 1986; Sonnante et al. 1994).

Caches of bean seed from cliff dweller sites in the Southwest U.S. that date back to 1000 AD are evidence of the spread of beans from these centers of domestication to other regions in the Americas. Seed types of the commercial market classes in the U.S. appear to have independent points of entry into the U.S. One via the Inter-mountain western states from Mesoamerica and another along the eastern Atlantic coast where beans were introduced by early colonists from South and Central America via Europe. The latter types were later moved to the Midwest by early settlers. Medium-sized vine beans dominated the introductions from Mesoamerica, while the smaller navy and larger kidney and garden beans were first introduced into the eastern U.S (Gepts et al. 1988).

A. Trends in Genetic Diversity within Different Production Regions: M. Brick and J. Myers

There is a concern about genetic vulnerability of the bean crop in the U.S. and the lack of adequate genetic diversity to meet specific eventualities. Although commercial production is relatively isolated across a dozen geographically isolated areas, there is a potential threat from localized genetic vulnerability within specific production regions. The tradition of growing only one or a few market classes within a geographic region, coupled with genetic similarities among varieties of a class increases the problem. For example, in Michigan, where navy beans constitute approximately 70% of the acreage, five commercial cultivars dominate the market and three of these share C-20 in the parentage. The situation in Michigan has improved in recent years with the shift away from Seafarer and Sanilac that constituted 90% of the acreage in 1989. In addition, black, dark red kidney, light red kidney and cranberry cultivars that possess unique genetic backgrounds from navy have expanded to 30% of the acreage in Michigan.

In Colorado and the contiguous production zones of SW Nebraska and NW Kansas, pinto beans are produced on over 200,000 acres. The variety mix has shifted in the past ten years to several cultivars with Bill Z, UI 126, Othello, NW 410, and private cultivars dominating the acreage. However, most of these cultivars share a fairly narrow genetic base from the Durango race of the Mesoamerican gene pool. New pinto cultivars such as Sierra, Chase, Apache and others have recently been introduced that were developed by introgression of germplasm from the Mesoamerican race and others. The private sector has a portion of that acreage of which the pedigrees and relationships to other varieties are not generally known.

In adjacent states like Nebraska, the situation with great northerns is similar. In 1982, cultivar Valley occupied 60% of the acreage; currently, the private variety Beryl occupies 60 to 70% of the 193,000 acres planted to great northerns. Since the pedigree of Beryl is unknown, its genetic relationship to the other varieties planted is of concern as this could affect the vulnerability of the region. Within the great northern class, there is a close relationship between cultivars Valley, Harris, Tara, and Sapphire because of the extensive use of Neb #1 sel 27 for bacterial disease resistance.

In North Dakota, the diversification of navy bean cultivars has increased in the past ten years. In 1989, 90% of the 170,000 acres planted to navy beans was occupied by the single cultivar Upland. Today, the cultivars Norstar, Upland, Schooner and Agri I occupy 26, 20, 18 and 11% of the acreage, respectively. In the pinto market class, over 350,000 acres were harvested in 1995. The pinto cultivars Othello, Topaz, Nodak, and Fiesta encompassed 44, 22, 16 and 2% of that acreage, respectively. This represents a change from 1989 where the private variety Topaz occupied 65% of the 220,000 acres planted to pinto beans.

In Idaho, more than 80% of dry and snap bean seed production takes place in the southern portion of the state for shipment throughout the U.S., Canada and globally. This means that many different cultivars are grown within the state, and consequently, genetic variability is likely the highest in the nation. While genetic variability is high, the concentration of the crop leaves bean seed production vulnerable to a regional crop failure. Seed-borne diseases introduced from elsewhere as well as natural disasters could strongly affect the supply of bean seed. The dry climate in combination with disease quarantines limits the spread of bacterial and fungal diseases, but the crop is susceptible to attack by seed-borne virus diseases such as BCMV and BCMNV. However, the region has never had a regional crop failure since beans were first produced in the early 1900s. Approximately 120,000 acres of commercial dry beans and 60,000 acres of seed beans are produced in Idaho annually. While the seed acreage is genetically diverse, the commercial acreage relies on relatively few cultivars. Of total commercial bean acreage grown in 1994, 52% were pintos, 19% were small reds, 17% were pinks, and 3% were great northerns, all of which belong to race Durango. Idaho is the number one producer of small reds and pinks, ranks second in production of great northerns, and fourth in production of pintos. Nearly all of the small red acreage is dominated by NW 63, although a new cultivar, UI 239 appears to be increasing. For pinks, the acreage is dominated by two cultivars, Viva and UI 537, in roughly equal proportions. The great northerns grown in Idaho are predominately UI 60, UI 425, and US 1140. Within the pinto market class, Othello, NW 410, Olathe, and Nodak predominate. However, Bill Z and Arapaho are increasing in acreage.

In California, common bean production represented in 1995 about 25 % of the total area (145,000 acres) grown in beans. Lima beans (baby and large) were grown on about 33%, blackeyes on 30%, and garbanzos on 13%.

In attempting to access the vulnerability of U.S. snap beans, the problem appears less acute initially for a number of reasons. Snap beans are a minor crop with less than a quarter of a million acres planted across ten states. In those states with relatively high concentration of bean acreage, Wisconsin, Oregon, Florida, Georgia, and New York, there is intercrop buffering and dispersion of relatively small bean fields of several different cultivars. It is unlikely that horizon-to-horizon plantings of single snap bean cultivars will occur as with wheat, corn, or soybean production, in part due to the small acreage, but also due to the diversity in cultivars developed specifically for the canning, frozen, and fresh market. In addition, there is a well regulated seed production industry for snap beans and a wide geographic separation of basic seed stocks in the arid western states from the major Midwestern and/or eastern production states. This separation of seed stocks and commercial production greatly reduces the likelihood of buildup of seed-borne pathogens. This system of seed production, however functional for snap beans, has been utilized less with dry beans in Michigan and North Dakota. Furthermore, recent molecular evidence suggests that snap beans possess much greater genetic diversity than dry beans (Weeden 1984; Haley et al., 1994a; Skroch and Nienhuis, 1995).

Another assessment of the relative genetic vulnerability differences exhibited by snap and dry bean cultivars is demonstrated by their respective reactions to different races of the rust fungus. Stavely (pers. comm.) reported in 1989, that 66 bush snap bean cultivars and 15 bush wax beans had the same reaction to rust races 38 to 70, similar to one of the original processing type snap bean cultivars, Early Gallatin. In addition, similar reactions were exhibited by the majority of commercial light and dark red kidney cultivars. This similarity of reaction to rust was exhibited by many of the PI lines originated from the Andean domestication center. The host cultivar's reaction to these races indicated greater genetic diversity in U.S. dry bean cultivars than in U.S. snap bean cultivars. In recent years new snap and dry bean cultivars have been released that confer resistance to races of rust in the U.S. The resistance genes utilized by cultivars released in the past five years has been dominated by the Ur-3 allele in dry beans and Ur-4 allele in snap beans.

Genetic diversity is usually thought of as the amount of genetic variability among individuals of a variety, population, or species. Although genetic vulnerability may result from a reduction in genetic variability, it is known that genetic diversity per se does not prevent vulnerability unless that diversity includes genetic resistance to the particular pathogen or stress causing the problem. This point is underscored by the obvious diversity in landrace beans in Malawi. Martin and Adams (1987) described extensive phenological, morphological, and seed type variation in landrace beans grown in the same field in Malawi, yet the overall productivity is low because of susceptibility to diseases and seasonal fluctuations of stress factors. Breeders should strive to increase the genetic diversity in cultivars released, but in the absence of unusual disease or environmental stress, they tend to concentrate on crosses of elite lines and cultivars, thus reducing genetic diversity of newly released cultivars. Lack of knowledge about the characteristics of accessions in the collections and difficulty of transferring some of the traits from an exotic genotype to cultivated beans restricts utilization. Furthermore, applied breeding programs which emphasize germplasm utilization are being replaced by laboratory-oriented programs with emphasis on DNA technology and computer modeling.

The need to pyramid multiple disease, insect, and environment stress resistances into commercially acceptable genetic backgrounds utilized by commercial breeders and to focus more basic research on quantitative traits like yield and population improvement strategies is critical. The loss of public breeding programs would further increase the problems of genetic vulnerability since the private sector does not have an orientation toward long-term population improvement. In order to meet the challenges posed by lack of diversity, the bean industry must rely on the in-depth genetic reserves within the genus. There are long established state and regional breeding programs in each of the major production areas, supplying a continuous flow of genetically improved germplasm and cultivars, with an ever-broadening genetic base in the form of multiple disease and environmental stress resistant factors sufficient to raise and stabilize yields. These programs must be enhanced to maintain a stable snap and dry bean industry in the U.S.

The present system of utilizing exotic germplasm materials has been improved by the introgression of specific pest resistance genes from different races in the Mesoamerican gene pools. The potential for greatly expanding our genetic germplasm base in commercial cultivars, while carrying the industry to new levels of yield, adaptation, and quality characteristics, still exists. There is a tremendous backlog of information and enhanced genetic materials that are only a few steps away from commercial utilization. However, to accomplish those breakthroughs will require the utilization of new molecular techniques such as RAPDs, SCARs, RFLPs and others to facilitate identification of novel genetic recombinations not present in germplasm collections or cultivars. Only new administrative approaches that foster integrated collaborative team research with adequate resources will ensure the success of these endeavors. Furthermore, new collaborative ventures between the public and private sectors will enhance progress in cultivar development. Perhaps the NPGS can be a catalyst to provide the resources and organizational focus to bring together these diverse agencies to develop the protocols to accomplish these objectives.

B. Cytoplasmic Genetic Diversity: C. Chase

In beans, chloroplast DNA variability is limited (Llaca et al. 1994), but restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) were detected among four varieties (Mecosta, Tuscoloa, Swedish Brown and Swan Valley) when DNAs were fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Lee, 1988).

Mitochondrial DNA RFLPs are more readily detected than chloroplast DNA RFLPs. This is due in part to the structural complexity of plant mitochondrial genomes (reviewed by Mackenzie et al., 1995). These complex multipartite genomes are subject to rearrangements and changes in the stoichiometry of the various genome components. Mitochondrial genome alterations can be influenced by nuclear genes, and mitochondrial genome variation therefore reflects, at least in part, variation in the nuclear genome.

Khairallah et al. (1990) examined the mitochondrial genomes of 20 Malawian land races and 3 cultivars of P. vulgaris. This work identified 5 RFLPs, which divided the entries according to the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools. Mitochondrial genomes of wild Phaseolus vulgaris accessions were more variable, as 20 RFLPs were identified among 6 accessions (Khairallah et al., 1992). Accessions from the Southern Andes were distinguished from those originating in the Northern Andes and Mesoamerica.

Sterility-inducing cytoplasms have been identified in P. vulgaris, P. coccineus, and P. polyanthus (Hervieu et al., 1993). Surprisingly, all sterility-inducing cytoplasms characterized to date possess the same mitochondrial-encoded sterility determinant (designated pvs) (Hervieu et al., 1993). An examination of the overall mitochondrial genome diversity among normal and sterility inducing cytoplasms of these species revealed a number of RFLPs. Overall, the mitochondrial RFLPs indicated the CMS and normal P. coccineus cytoplasms were more closely related than the CMS P. coccineus and CMS P. vulgaris cytoplasms, suggesting the sterility determinant predated the divergence of P. vulgaris and P. coccineus (Hervieu et al., 1994). Cytoplasms analyzed in this study were crossed into a common nuclear background, so the influence of nuclear genome upon mitochondrial genome organization was minimal.

The pvs determinant was also identified in wild P. vulgaris and P. coccineus accessions. Male-fertility in a number of the P. vulgaris accessions carrying this determinant suggests the presence of nuclear fertility restoration systems in these materials. The relationship of these fertility restorers to the two restoration systems already identified (Mackenzie et al., 1988; Mackenzie, 1991) will be of considerable interest.


A. Collection: P. Gepts

Additional collection in the South Andean Center is justified by the presence of many phaseolin types (Gepts, et al., 1986) indicating wider diversity than in any other center. The A and H phaseolins are represented in seed banks by only 1 and 4 accessions, respectively; it is unlikely that these types are represented by so few genotypes in nature while the other S, T, and C types are present in thousands of accessions.

Collection priorities for P. vulgaris in the American centers of diversification should be for landraces from central and southern Peru and Bolivia. The wild ancestral forms should be collected everywhere, but mainly in Central America. These could be used directly in bean breeding, but wild collections will also serve as geographical markers for thousands of seed accessions which lack any passport data. Debouck (1988) states that the plotting of all accessions available suggests that more collections of the wild form could be advantageously carried out in (modified following collections in 1990 and 1994 by Debouck and Gepts - see Debouck et al. (1993) and Freyre et al. 1996)):

Mexico: in the mountainous range north of Guadalajara, east of Sinaloa, the mountainous range around the Balsas, the Sierra Madre Oriental, the States of Oaxaca and Chiapas.

Guatemala: everywhere in the mountainous areas.

Honduras: everywhere in the mountainous areas.

Nicaragua: in the region of Estelí.

Costa Rica: in the meseta Central.

Panama: in the Chiriquí Province.

Colombia: Santander, Huila.

Peru: everywhere in inter-Andean valleys with the exception of places previously visited by Debouck and co-workers in Cajamarca, Junin, and Apurimac.

Argentina: more materials could be collected in Catamarca, Cordoba, and San Luis. Documentation about sites is excellent thanks to the explorations of Burkhart, Brücher, and others.

Countries such as Colombia and Costa Rica, which have a high degree of germplasm exchange, would benefit from a link between germplasm explorations with biochemical analysis (e.g., phaseolin studies) in order to develop more appropriate sampling strategies. The same statement seems also valid for secondary centers of diversity in the Caribbean. Specific germplasm explorations in limited geographical areas such as Peru have revealed that the germplasm represented in the collection was not representative and that it could be increased over 400% after more careful field work. Rapid economic changes (e.g., globalization of trade), continued high population growth, unsustainable agricultural practices, and destruction of natural vegetation throughout the Americas, suggest high priority should be given to continued collection of both wild forms and landraces. Beside the fact that more field work is still needed for the wild ancestral forms of all four cultigens and for the species which are still unrepresented in seed banks, evaluation and crossability studies can now begin. Such studies can now be done on half of the genus and should benefit further from information fed back from collection activities.

Some concern for loss of germplasm exists in eastern Africa with the current focus by both CIAT and CRSP on germplasm enhancement and the introduction of improved lines into that region. The input of new materials will most certainly put into jeopardy the current landrace variability that exists in the cultivated Phaseolus species within the entire region. The potential to market specific seed types and classes further risks the loss of native germplasm. Molecular analyses, however, reveal few if any new variants among beans from secondary centers of diversity compared to the diversity in the centers of origin (e.g., Gepts and Bliss 1988). This observation suggests that evolution for 400 years in isolation from the centers of origin has generated little new diversity although new recombinants and changes in gene frequency have been observed. Collections in secondary centers of diversity should therefore be given lower priority from the standpoint of the U.S. (Local collections should, however, be established because they would include local materials that have reasonably good adaptation and reflect the local agronomic and culinary preferences.)

Since progress in bean breeding has frequently been erratic and not decisive, the absence of major breakthroughs may be linked to the very narrow variability of the progenitors, often selected within the same gene pool or race. Biochemical studies have demonstrated that the wild common beans are much richer in genetic diversity than their cultivated relatives (Gepts et al. 1986; Koenig et al. 1990; Sonnante et al. 1994), where the obvious diversity in seed colors and types may result from very few genes. Further collecting should be oriented towards preserving all variation for its potential benefits to humanity.

B. Evaluation: J. Steadman and D. Coyne

Scientists will be more likely to screen a subsample of the 13,000 Phaseolus accessions for traits such as pest or pathogen resistance than the entire collection or a series of numbers. With the core project underway, a representative sample of the core needs to be selected and then evaluated at least for reaction to certain diseases. White mold, rust, web blight, root rot, bean common mosaic, bacterial brown spot and Fusarium wilt (yellows) are important diseases where finding improved resistance would benefit our bean industry. However, core collections may not be valuable where resistance to a particular pathogen or pest, or some other particular trait is expected to occur at a very low frequency. Core collections will be particularly useful where it is desired to improve the level of a particular trait and where considerable diversity exists in the collection. In addition any associations between resistances to different diseases and/or other traits would be beneficial to know. Testing a core subsample would be a high priority for germplasm evaluation under many circumstances.

C. Enhancement: P. Miklas and P. Gepts

After germplasm has been evaluated, the potentially useful characteristics need to be transferred into a phenotype useful to private and public cultivar development programs. This often entails years of hybridization, screening, and recurrent selection to put the new character into an adapted background, essentially one or several crosses from a finished variety. Public researchers are not likely to undertake this kind of long-term work because it does not lead to frequent original publications which are the major basis for promotion. General genetic linkage maps and genetic markers for specific qualitative and quantitative traits and other biotechnological activities will likely continue to contribute to germplasm evaluation and enhancement, and in increasing genetic diversity in Phaseolus, but they constantly need to be integrated with traditional breeding programs.

Wild vulgaris and the related cultigens, P. acutifolius and P. coccineus, still remain an relatively untapped novel source of useful traits for dry and snap bean improvement. The usefulness of interspecific populations could be maximized by screening them against many different biotic and abiotic stresses. This would be best accomplished by circulating the interspecific materials among many programs for screening in different environments. The potential of converting tropical photoperiod sensitive dry beans into day neutral lines for evaluation and utilization in temperate environments for contributing to genetic diversity should continue to be examined. A similar program in sorghum has generated genetic diversity and provided novel resistance genes and traits for US breeding programs. The larger-seeded kidney and cranberry beans would especially benefit from increased genetic diversity as yields have stayed the same in these market classes the past 10 to 20 years.

The relative dearth of diversity within commercial classes and cultivated races of common bean are leading bean breeders and geneticists to explore the usefulness of crosses between more distantly related crosses (e.g., Beaver and Kelly 1994, Singh et al. 1992a,b) and to identify natural examples of introgression between the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools (Paredes and Gepts 1994) or between wild and cultivated beans (Singh et al. 1991b; Freyre et al. 1995; Beebe et al. 1997). Additional genetic diversity and a better understanding of the transfer of quantitative traits across wider crosses in the cultivated gene pool of common bean can be exoected from these studies.

D. Preservation: R. Hannan

Continued efforts need to be made to reduce duplication in the collection. Careful scrutiny of the passport information needs to be made. With the recent molecular technologies, parameters need to be established whereby the curator can refer duplicate accessions to one active accession and then eliminate the duplicate from the active collection. This could conceivably impact the long term efforts of seed regeneration.

Even though greenhouse seed increase has been successful for the majority of Phaseolus species in the collection, there are species that need to be grown in short day tropical sites. A site such as the Molokai, Hawaii, NRCS, Plant Materials Center needs to be identified and established for some of these very special increase needs. This can be incorporated into an NPGS-wide tropical, short-day increase program.

E. Genetic Stocks Collection: J. Myers

Over 100 genes for morphological traits, disease resistances, and isozyme markers have been described and published (Bassett, 1993). As detailed above, only 25 genetic marker accessions are publicly available from the PI collection. Many of marker lines may be lost, particularly those described in the older papers. As an example, much of the genetic analysis of common bean was done by H. Lamprecht from the early 1930's to the early 1960's. Upon his death, his extensive collection of genetic stocks was neglected for many years before seed was obtained by the Plant Introduction Station. As a result, a number of lines in this collection are now extinct along with the traits that they carry. Even with marker lines used in more contemporary studies, there has not been a concerted effort to place these in the PI collection.

Efforts should be made to increase seed without mixtures of all lines in the collection, and some effort is needed to reduce the amount of duplication in the collection. This is generally true for beans except for the more recent introductions, but is not true for some other species.

F. Phaseolus Electronic Databases P. McClean

The initial funding for the BeanGenes database has all been spent. We know have in place the hardware and software to maintain a reasonable size database available to the bean community. The majority of the basic information has been deposited and is available to all with electronic access to the internet. Without additional funding, all of the additional efforts will be on a volunteer basis by Phil McClean.

The database will continue to populated with variety trail data as it is made available to the curator. The gene symbols will be updated as that information is made available by the Genetics Committee. The last major effort will be the conversion of all of the Cooperative Dry Bean Nursery data in WWW table format, and the development of a search engine to look at that data in a systematic manner.

Any other BeanGenes efforts would require additional funding. One data source that has not been tapped to any significant extent is the information at CIAT. The development of a systematic method of searching their databases would certainly contribute significantly to the knowledge needed by US plant breeders to use the CIAT material as germplasm resource. As the use of molecular markers becomes a tool at the applied level, access to digital representations of informative polymorphisms becomes more pressing. Funds to support archiving that information from all researchers is also necessary. Previous discussion about the need to develop core collection is very valid. If such an effort is instituted, archiving that information will be essential. BeanGenes would certainly be one vehicle to organize and distribute that information to the breeding community.


In general, there has been an emphasis on projects relating to evaluation of the P.I. collection for commercially important characteristics and on enhancement. Projects should show substantial results or be complete within 1 to 3 years, with options for renewed support for that period. Past annual levels of funding have been around $20,000. In the past, rust screening and development of a marker gene collection in a related genetic background for seed coat color, have been funded. (BCMV cleanup is now part of the Western Regional Station budget.) The other projects would be new.

1. Proposal for the establishment of a core collection representing 10% of the base collection to facilitate germplasm evaluation. A strategy for the development of a Phaseolus core collection is being formulated by a subcommittee of the Phaseolus CGC. A proposal for validating and comparing the amount of genetic diversity of the base collection represented by different core-sampling techniques using RAPD markers.

2. Many researchers have expressed interest in evaluating the core collection, once established and readily available, for different traits including heat tolerance, white mold resistance, root rot resistance, and bean golden mosaic virus resistance among others. Compiling multiple data on the same core would probably be the most beneficial in the long term. The problem in evaluating accessions assigned to the core that are photoperiod sensitive and have Type IV long vining growth habits needs to be addressed. Perhaps these accessions could be converted to day-neutral non-Type-IV plants.

3. Screening wild Phaseolus vulgaris for resistance to BCMV, and other traits has been proposed. A core collection of this material could be flagged in the PI collection, also, to facilitate evaluation.

4. Methods to efficiently introgress quantitative genetic variability (e.g., yield) from wild, ancestral beans need to be developed.

5. Competitive Grants program for Genetic Resources: Long term advances in the safeguard and utilization of genetic resources will depend on more reliable, long-term funding. This could be modeled after the Plant Genome section of the NRI. Alternatively, more innovative funding schemes could be developed that represent a partnership between the public and private sector.


Adam-Blondon AF, Sevignac M, Dron M, Bannerot H (1994) A genetic map of common bean to localize specific resistance genes against anthracnose. Genome 37: 915-924

Ali M (1950) Genetics of resistance to the common bean mosaic virus (bean virus 1) in the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Phytopathology 40:69-79

Bassett MJ (1993) List of genes - Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu Rept Bean Improv Coop 36: vi-xxiii

Beaver JS, Kelly JD (1994) Comparison of selection methods for dry bean populations derived from crosses between gene pools. Crop Sci 34: 34-37

Becerra Velásquez V, Gepts P. 1994. RFLP diversity in common bean. Genome 37: 256-263

Beebe S, Toro Ch O, González AV, Chacón MI, Debouck DG (1997) Wild-weed-crop complexes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) in the Andes of Peru and Colombia, and their implications for conservation and breeding. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44: 73-91

Brunner BR, Beaver JS (1989) Estimation of outcrossing of the common bean in Puerto Rico. HortScience 24:669-71

Debouck DG (1988) Final report - Collaborative project IBPGR-CIAT on Phaseolus germplasm collection AGPG/IBPGR: 83/129

Debouck DG, Toro O, Paredes OM, Johnson WC, Gepts P (1993) Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris in northwestern South America. Econ Bot 47:408-23

Freyre R, Johnson WC, Shirmohamadali A, Llaca V, Tsai SM, Pereira PA, Skroch P, Nienhuis J, Adam-Blondon A-F, Dron M, Tohme J, and Gepts P. 1996. Correlation among RFLP maps in common bean. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 39: 231-232

Freyre R, Ríos R, Guzmán L, Debouck DG, Gepts P (1996) Ecogeographic distribution of Phaseolus spp. (Fabaceae) in Bolivia. Econ Bot 50:195-215

Freytag GF, Bassett MJ, Zapata M (1982) Registration of XR-235-1-1 bean germplasm. Crop Sci 22:1268-69

Garvin DF, Weeden NF (1994) Isozyme evidence supporting a single geographic origin for domesticated tepary bean. Crop Sci 34:1390-95

Gepts P, Bliss FA (1985) F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean: differential geographic origin suggests two gene pools in cultivated bean germplasm. J Hered 76: 447-450

Gepts P, Bliss FA (1988) Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II. Europe and Africa. Econ Bot 42: 86-104

Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40:451-68

Gepts P, Kmiecik K, Pereira P, Bliss FA (1988) Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. I. The Americas. Econ Bot 42: 73-85.

Gepts P, Nodari R, Tsai R, Koinange EMK, Llaca V, Gilbertson R, Guzmán P (1993) Linkage mapping in common bean. Annu Rept Bean Improv Coop 36: xxiv-xviii

Guzmán P, Gilbertson RL, Nodari R, Johnson WC, Temple SR, Mandala D, Mkandawire ABC, Gepts P (1995) Characterization of variability in the fungus Phaeoisariopsis griseola suggests coevolution with the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Phytopathology 85:600-07

Haley SD, Afanador L, Kelly JD (1994a) Selection for monogenic resistance traits with coupling- and repulsion-phase RAPD markers. Crop Sci 34:1061-66

Haley SD, Miklas PN, Afanador L, Kelly JD (1994b) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker variability between and within gene pools of common bean. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 119:122-25

Hervieu F, Charbonnier L, Bannerot H, Pelletier G (1993) The cytoplasmic male-sterility (CMS) determinant of common bean is widespread in Phaseolus coccineus L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Current Genet 21:149-55

Hervieu F, Bannerot H, Pelletier G (1994) A unique cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) determinant is present in three Phaseolus species characterized by different mitochondrial genomes. Theor Appl Genet 88:314-20

Honma S (1956) A bean interspecific hybrid. J Hered 47:217-20

Hosfield GL, Kelly JD, Silbernagel MJ, Stavely JR, Adams MW, Uebersax MA, Varner GV (1995) Eight small-red dry bean germplasm with upright architecture. HortScience 30:1479-82

Johnson WC, Guzmán P, Mandala D, Mkandawire ABC, Temple S, Gilbertson RL, and Gepts P (1997) Molecular tagging of the bc-3 gene for introgression into Andean common bean. Crop Sci. 37: 248-254

Kami J, Becerra Velásquez B, Debouck DG, Gepts P (1995) Identification of presumed ancestral DNA sequences of phaseolin in Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:1101-04

Kaplan L. 1994. Accelerator mass spectrometry dates and the antiquity of Phaseolus cultivation. Annu Rept Bean Improv Coop. 37: 131-32

Kelly JD (1995) Use of RAPD markers in breeding for major gene resistance to plant pathogens. HortScience 30:461-65

Khairallah MM, Adams MW, Sears BB (1990) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms of Malawian bean lines: further evidence for two major gene pools. Theor Appl Genet 80:753-61

Khairallah MM, Sears BB, Adams MW (1992) Mitochondrial restriction fragment polymorphisms in wild Phaseolus vulgaris - insights in the domestication of common bean. Theor Appl Genet 84:915-22

Koenig R, Singh SP, Gepts P (1990) Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 44: 50-60

Koinange EMK, Gepts P (1992). Hybrid weakness in wild Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Hered 83: 135-139

Lee PC (1988) Studies of chloroplast transmission and F2 hybrid variegation in the common bean Phaseolus vulgaris. MS thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Llaca V, Delgado Salinas A, Gepts P. 1994. Chloroplast DNA as an evolutionary marker in the Phaseolus vulgaris complex. Theor Appl Genet 88: 646-652

Lucier G (1995a) Per capita use of dry edible beans. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 19 (3), Spring 1995: pp. 25-34

Lucier G (1995b) The situation and outlook of U.S. dry beans. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 20(1), Fall 1995: pp. 9-13

Mackenzie SA (1991) Identification of a sterility-inducing cytoplasm in a fertile accession line of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetics 127:411-16

Mackenzie SA, Pring DR, Bassett MJ, Chase CD (1988) Mitochondrial DNA rearrangement associated with fertility restoration and cytoplasmic reversion to fertility in cytoplasmic male sterile Phaseolus vulgaris L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2714-17

Mackenzie SA, He S, Lyznik A (1995) The elusive plant mitochondrion as a genetic system. Plant Physiol 105:775-80

Martin GB, Adams MW (1987) Landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northern Malawi. I. Regional variation. Econ Bot 41:190-203

McClean PE, Myers JR, Hammond JJ (1993) Coefficient of parentage and cluster analysis of North American dry bean cultivars. Crop Sci 33:190-97

Miklas PN, Santiago J (1996) Evaluation of select tepary bean for reaction to bean golden mosaic virus. HortScience 31: 430-432

Miklas PN, Stavely JR, Kelly JD (1993) Identification and potential use of a molecular marker for rust resistance in common bean. Theor Appl Genet 85:745-49

Miklas PN, Beaver JS, Grafton KF, Freytag GF (1994a) Registration of TARS-VCI-4B multiple disease-resistant dry bean germplasm. Crop Sci 34:1415

Miklas PN, Rosas JC, Beaver JS, Telek L, Freytag GF (1994b) Field performance of select tepary bean for the tropics. Crop Sci 34:1639-44

Moh CC (1971) Mutation breeding in seed-coat colors of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 20:119-25

Nodari RO, Tsai SM, Guzmán P, Gilbertson RL, Gepts P (1993) Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 3. Mapping genetic factors controlling host-bacteria interactions. Genetics 134:341-50

Osborn TC (1988) Genetic control of bean seed protein. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 7:93-116

Paredes OM, Gepts P (1994) Extensive introgression of Middle American germplasm into Chilean common bean cultivars. Genet Res Crop Evol 42: 29-41

Parker JB (1995a) Africa's dry bean import demand rising. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 19 (4), Summer 1995: 2-7

Parker J (1995b) World production of pulses trending upward. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 20 (1), Fall 1995: 2-5

Patel PN, Walker JC (1966) Inheritance of tolerance to halo blight in bean. Phytopathology 56:681-82

Phaseolus-Vigna Genome Mapping Information: mapdata2.htm

Salgado MO, Schwartz HF, Brick MA, Pastor-Corrales MA (1994) Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. phaseoli in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius). Plant Dis 78:357-60

Scott ME, Michaels TE (1992) Xanthomonas resistance of Phaseolus interspecific cross selection confirmed by field performance. HortScience 27:348-50

Silbernagel MJ (1994) Release of pinto breeding line 92US-1006 with I Bc-22 resistance to bean common mosaic virus U.S.D.A., Univ. of Idaho, and Oregon State Univ. 2 p

Silbernagel MJ, Hannan RM (1992) Use of plant introductions to develop U.S. cultivars. In: Shands HL, Wiesner LE (eds), Use of plant introductions in developing new cultivars. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 1-9

Singh SP, Gutiérrez JA (1984) Geographical distribution of the Dl1 and Dl2 genes causing hybrid dwarfism in Phaseolus vulgaris L., their association with seed size, and their significance to breeding. Euphytica 33 : 337 - 345.

Singh SP, Urrea CA (1995) Inter- and intraracial hybridization and selection for seed yield in early generations of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Euphytica 81:131-37

Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991a) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379-96

Singh SP, Gutiérrez JA, Molina A, Urrea C, Gepts P (1991b) Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci 31:23-29

Singh SP, Terán J, Molina A, Gutiérrez JA (1992a) Combining ability for seed yield and its components in common bean of Andean origin. Crop Sci 32:81-84

Singh SP, Urrea CA, Molina A, Gutiérrez JA (1992b) Performance of small-seeded common bean from the second selection cycle and multiple-cross intra- and interracial populations. Can J Plant Sci 72:735-41

Skroch P, Nienhuis J (1995) Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 91:1078-85

Sonnante G, Stockton T, Nodari RO, Becerra Velásquez VL, Gepts P (1994) Evolution of genetic diversity during the domestication of common-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 89:629-35

Stavely JR (1984) Genetics of resistance to Uromyces phaseoli in a Phaseolus vulgaris line resistant to most races of the pathogen. Phytopathology 74:339-44

Stavely JR, Grafton KF (1985) Genetics of resistance to 8 races of Uromyces appendiculatus in Phaseolus vulgaris cultivar Mexico 235. Phytopathology 75:1310 (Abstr.)

Stavely JR, McMillan RT Jr (1992) BARC-rust resistance - bush, fresh-market, green bean germplasm lines. HortScience 27:1052-54

Stavely JR, Silbernagel MJ (1993) Simultaneous screening for reactions to rust and bean common mosaic virus. Annu Rept Bean Improv Coop 36:164-65

Stavely JR, Kelly JD, Grafton KF (1992) Release of four erect, short-vine pinto bean germplasm lines, BelDakMi-rust resistant-1, -2, -3, and -4 U.S.D.A., North Dakota and Michigan Agric. Exper. Sta. Germplasm Release Notice. 3p

Stavely JR, Kelly JD, Grafton KF (1994) BelMiDak-rust-resistant navy dry bean germplasm lines. HortScience 29:709-11

Stockton T, Gepts P (1994) Identification of DNA probes that reveal polymorphisms among closely related Phaseolus vulgaris lines. Euphytica 76: 177-183.

Tohme J, González DO, Beebe S, Duque MC (1996) AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Sci. 36: 1375-84

Urrea C, Singh SP (1995) Comparison of recurrent and congruity backcross for interracial hybridization in common bean. Euphytica 81: 21-26

USDA 1: gopher://

USDA 2: gopher://

USDA 3: gopher://

USDA 4: gopher://

USDA 5: gopher://

Vallejos EC, Sakiyama NS, Chase CD (1992) A molecular marker-based linkage map of Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 131: 733-740.

Weeden NF (1984) Distinguishing among white-seeded bean cultivars by means of allozyme genotypes. Euphytica 33: 193-208

Wells WC, Isom WH, Waines JG (1988) Outcrossing rates of six common bean lines. Crop Sci 28:177-78

Updated 01-Nov-2005
ARS Home | | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | | White House