NRSP/IR BUDGET REQUESTS -- ATTACHMENT I
ACCOMPLISHMENTS CY2003
NRSP-6: Introduction, Classification, Preservation, Evaluation and Distribution of tuber-bearing Solanum species germplasm.
Introduction:
Important progress was made in building the collection. We incorporated unique germplasm from the US, Sweden, Poland, Mexico and the UK.
Classification: Dr. Spooner continues to resolve problems in taxonomic classification that impede efficient documentation and use of the germplasm. Insights gained from these studies will allow accessions to be assigned stable species names based on empirical differences.
Preservation: The usual work for maintenance of top quality Solanum germplasm at NRSP-6 was continued. Germination tests were done on new seed and on others on a 5-year rotation. Virus tests were done on new seeds and the in vitro clonal stocks. Seed increases were done in the spring, fall and summer. Research was done to determine the most effective germination, culture and seed increase methods. DNA markers were used to assess several aspects of the status and dynamics of genetic diversity in the genebank.
Evaluation was continued in house or with collaborators specializing in the particular trait: Combining frost tolerance with good tuber type, tuber calcium, tuber and foliar glycoalkaloids, late blight, antioxidants and hormone mutants.
Distribution: NRSP-6 distributed 11,980 units of germplasm to 159 cooperators across the USA and internationally. This was an unusually high volume of demand for our germplasm.
Intergenebank Collaboration: Research continued
to determine the genetic consequences of tuber vs seed collection. Research
cooperation with CIP and VIR was planned. A meeting of Latin American
curators at the ALAP meeting was organized.
NRSP/IR BUDGET REQUESTS -- ATTACHMENT II
GOALS CY2004
NRSP-6: Introduction, Classification, Preservation, Evaluation and Distribution of tuber-bearing Solanum species germplasm.
Introduction: We will continue 2003’s success in identifying and importing stocks that will be used for the genetic improvement of the potato crop. We will strengthen our collaborative ties with other genebanks. Introduction is expected to be somewhat restricted due to delays in sharing by host countries and limited capacity of the US Quarantine lab.
Classification: Experiments to better understand species boundaries will continue.
Preservation: Efforts to identify less expensive, easier, and more reliable ways to grow and increase potato germplasm will continue. Samples of new germplasm will be transferred to NSSL and/or the University of Wisconsin for backup. Rigorous disease prevention and monitoring practices (mainly for viruses) will be continued. We will continue bacterial ring rot screening as a health monitoring protocol for the in vitro collection. We will continue research to measure the status and dynamics of genetic diversity in the genebank pursuant to preventing its loss during preservation.
Evaluation: We will continue evaluating potato germplasm for frost tolerance, glycoalkaloids, tuber calcium accumulation, hormone mutants, antioxidants, late blight, nematodes and other characteristics that impact the continued success of the potato crop. We also plan to pursue traits that impact consumers more directly to be more in touch with stake-holders. Evaluation is a high priority for the genebank, since it is the key to mining the value of the germplasm in which we have invested so much effort for preservation. We will continue work to find ways to manipulate tuberization for screening tuber traits.
Distribution: Potato is the world's most important vegetable crop, and the genebank at Sturgeon Bay is the world's most comprehensive and accessible collection. Germplasm and technical assistance for researchers and breeders will continue to be rapidly and impartially available here.
Intergenebank Collaboration: The cooperative intergenebank project will continue to use DNA markers to assess the dynamics of genetic diversity in model species. We will meet with Latin American genebank curators and continue joint research with sister genbanks in Peru and Russia.
NRSP-6 Appendix
JUSTIFICATION
For 3% SALARY increase in FY 2005
The need is increasing: The size of the collection and associated salaries, supplies and upkeep are rising. This combined with the flat budgets we have received in the past several years means we are “losing ground.” We ask that this problem at least be partially offset by a 3% increase for salaries in FY 2005 to redress recent attrition.
NRSP/IR BUDGET REQUESTS
SUMMARY
NRSP-6: Interregional Potato Introduction Project
|
|
Multistate Research Funding |
Other Sources of Funding |
||||||||
|
Description |
Authorized FY 2003a |
Authorized FY 2004 |
Proposed b FY 2005 |
Authorized FY 2004 |
Proposedc FY 2005 |
|||||
|
|
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
|
Salaries |
104,697 |
3.3 |
108,480 |
3.3 |
111,735 |
3.3 |
150,088 |
3.1 |
154,590 |
3.1 |
|
Fringe Benefits (Salary Only) |
32,324 |
|
33,294 |
|
34,293 |
|
59,929 |
|
61,727 |
|
|
Wages (+ wage fringe) d |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
20,000 |
|
20,600 |
|
|
Travel |
1,253 |
|
1,253 |
|
1,253 |
|
8,000 |
|
8,240 |
|
|
Supplies |
16,233 |
|
16,233 |
|
16,233 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Maintenance d |
7,068 |
|
2,315 |
|
2,315 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Equipment/Capital Imp. |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
UW Contribution (est.) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
68,034 |
|
70,075 |
|
|
TOTAL |
161,575 |
|
161,575 |
|
165,829 |
|
306,051 |
|
315,232 |
|
__________________
a Actual
b 3.0% salaries increase -- see Appendix: JUSTIFICATION
c Estimated 3% increase .
d reduce or eliminate part time labor and maintenance to offset salary increases at constant budget. “Other Sources…” now accounts realistic estimate of compensating contribution of ad hoc genebank labor costs from other funds.
Attachment III
NRSP-6 BUDGET REQUEST
NRSP-6: Interregional Potato Introduction Project
DETAILED INFORMATION ON POSITIONS, SALARIES, AND FRINGE BENEFITS
|
|
Multistate Research Funding |
Other Sources of Funding |
||||||||
|
SALARIES |
Authorizeda FY 2003 |
Authorizedb FY 2004 |
Requested FY 2005c |
Authorized FY 2004 |
Requested FY 2005 |
|||||
|
|
Dol1ars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
Dollars |
FTE |
|
Admin. Project Assistant |
30,186 |
0.6 |
29,415 |
0.6 |
30,298 |
0.6 |
18,149 |
0.4 |
18,694 |
0.4 |
|
Technician (Specialist) |
33,613 |
1.0 |
37,572 |
1.0 |
38,699 |
1.0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Technician |
18,139 |
1.0 |
18,231 |
1.0 |
18,778 |
1.0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Gardener |
6,219 |
0.2 |
6,226 |
0.2 |
6,413 |
0.2 |
24,377 |
0.8 |
25,108 |
0.8 |
|
˝ Research Assistant |
16,540 |
0.5 |
17,036 |
0.5 |
17,547 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Secretary / Clerical |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
16,424 |
0.6 |
16,917 |
0.6 |
|
ARS Research Leader |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
7,497 |
0.1 |
7,722 |
0.1 |
|
ARS Geneticist / Proj. Leader |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
53,040 |
0.8 |
54,631 |
0.8 |
|
ARS Research Botanist |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
30,600 |
0.4 |
31,518 |
0.4 |
|
Total Salaries |
104,697 |
|
108,480 |
|
111,735 |
|
150,087 |
|
154,590 |
|
|
Fringe Benefits (Salaries only) |
32,324 |
|
33,294 |
|
34,293 |
|
59,929 |
|
61,727 |
|
|
TOTAL |
137,021 |
3.3 |
141,774 |
3.3 |
146,028 |
3.3 |
210,016 |
3.1 |
216,317 |
3.1 |
a Actual
b FY 2004 expected salary adjustments average 3.4%
c Request 3% Salary increase